Product Keywords: enriched flour - FDA Notices of Judgment Collection, 1908-1966 Search Results

Start Over Product Keywords enriched flour ✖

21. 19353. Adulteration and misbranding of enriched flour. U. S. v. Blair Milling Co. Plea of nolo contendere. Fine of $200 and costs.

Defendants:: Blair Milling Co.
Issue Dates:: July 1953

22. 19208. Adulteration and misbranding of enriched flour. U. S. v. 43 Bags.

Defendants:: Ross Milling Co.
Issue Dates:: July 1953

23. 19154. Adulteration and misbranding of enriched flour. U. S. v. 1,223 Bags.

Defendants:: Blair Milling Co.
Issue Dates:: July 1953

24. 18606. Adulteration and misbranding of enriched flour. U. S. v. 300 Bags.

Defendants:: Kansas Milling Co.
Issue Dates:: December 1952

25. 18510. Adulteration and misbranding of enriched flour. U. S. v. 50 Bales.

Defendants:: Blair Milling Co.
Issue Dates:: November 1952

26. 18361. Adulteration and misbranding of enriched flour. U. S. v. Newport Cooperative Mill, Inc. Plea of guilty. Fine of $250, plus costs.

Defendants:: Newport Cooperative Mill, Inc.
Issue Dates:: October 1952

27. 18262. Adulteration and misbranding of enriched flour. U. S. v. 142 Bags.

Defendants:: Fort Morgan Mills
Issue Dates:: September 1952

28. 17956. Adulteration and misbranding of enriched flour. U. S. v. Central Milling Co. Plea of guilty. Fine, $100.

Defendants:: Central Milling Co.
Issue Dates:: June 1952

29. 17460. Adulteration and misbranding of enriched flour. U. S. v. Portales Milling Co. Plea of nolo contendere. Fine, $300.

Defendants:: Portales Milling Co.
Issue Dates:: December 1951

30. 17263. Adulteration and misbranding of enriched flour. U. S. v. Virgil H. Burchett (Pembroke Roller Mills). Plea of guilty. Fine, $200. Defendant placed on probation for 1 year.

Defendants:: Virgil H. Burchett, trading as the Pembroke Roller Mills, Pembroke, Ky.
Issue Dates:: September 1951

« Previous
Next »
1
2
3
4
5
6
7