Issue Dates: 1922 - FDA Notices of Judgment Collection, 1908-1966 Search Results

Start Over Issue Dates 1922 ✖

21. 10021. Adulteration and misbranding of ground barley. U. S. v. Gould Grain Co., a Corporation. Plea of gruilty. Fine, $1.

Defendants:: Gould Grain Co., a corporation, trading at Minneapolis, Minn.
Issue Dates:: 1922

22. 10022. Adulteration and misbranding of whole ground barley. U. S. v. Albert Dickinson Co., a Corporation. Plea of guilty. Fine, $25.

Defendants:: Albert Dickinson Co., a corporation, trading at Minneapolis, Minn.
Issue Dates:: 1922

23. 10023. Misbranding of Euca-Mul. U. S. v. 6 Dozen and 6 Dozen Bottles of Euca-Mul. Default decrees ordering the destruction of the product.

Defendants:: B. G. Binz Co., Los Angeles, Calif.
Issue Dates:: 1922

24. 10024. Adulteration and misbranding of port hot, port hot cherry, apple, orange, port hot Clico, port hot apple, and blackberry punch beverages. U. S. v. One Keg of Port Hot, et al. Default decrees finding products adulterated and misbranded and ordering their destruction.

Defendants:: Grown Beverage Go., St. Louis, Mo.
Issue Dates:: 1922

25. 10025. Adulteration and misbranding of whole ground barley feed. U. S. v. Culbert Milling Co., a Corporation. Plea of guilty. Fine, $25.

Defendants:: Culbert Milling Co., a corporation, Minneapolis, Minn.
Issue Dates:: 1922

26. 10026. Misbranding of DuBois Pecific pills. U. S. v. 11 Dozen Boxes of DuBois Pecific Pills. Default decree ordering destruction of the product.

Defendants:: William J. Baumgartner, Detroit, Mich.
Issue Dates:: 1922

27. 10027. Adulteration of canned water loganberries. U. S. v. 24 Cases of Canned Water Loganberries. Default decree ordering the destruction of the product.

Defendants:: Puyallup & Sumner Fruit Growers' Canning Co., Puyallup, Wash.
Issue Dates:: 1922

28. 10028. Adulteration and misbranding of barley feed. U. S.v. Sheffield Elevator Co., a Corporation. Plea of guilty. Fine, $25.

Defendants:: Sheffield Elevator Co., a corporation, Minneapolis, Minn.
Issue Dates:: 1922

29. 10029. Adulteration of chili powder. U. S. v. 35 Cases of Chili Powder. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Gebhardt Chili Powder Co., San Antonio, Tex.
Issue Dates:: 1922

30. 10030. Misbranding of Dr. Hiatt's Germicide. U. S. v. James A. Hiatt and George W. Denker (Hiatt Germicide Co.). Plea of guilty by defendant Hiatt. Fine, $100 and costs. Indictment nolle prossed as to defendant Denker.

Defendants:: James A. Hiatt and George W. Deuker, copartners, trading under the name of the Hiatt Germicide Co., Richmond, Ind.
Issue Dates:: 1922

31. 10031. Adulteration of canned salmon. U. S. v. 100 Cases of Canned Salmon. Default decree declaring product to adulterated and ordering its destruction.

Defendants:: Burke Fish Co., Portland, Oreg.
Issue Dates:: 1922

32. 10032. Adulteration of tomato catsup. U.S. v. 10 Cases and 60 Cases of Home Brand Tomato Catsup. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond.

Defendants:: Sears & Nichols Canning Co.
Issue Dates:: 1922

33. 10033. Adulteration and misbranding of vinegar. U. S. v. 65 Barrels, 730 Cases, and 96 Cases of Vinegar. Consent decrees of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond.

Defendants:: Naas Cider & Vinegar Co., Inc.
Issue Dates:: 1922

34. 10034. Misbranding of barley feed. U. S. v. W. P. Devereux Co., a Corporation. Plea of guilty. Fine, $25.

Defendants:: W. P. Devereux Co., a corporation, Minneapolis, Minn.
Issue Dates:: 1922

35. 10035. Adulteration of canned pie peaches. U. S. v. 322 Cases of Pie Peaches. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond.

Defendants:: Booth Packing Co., Baltimore, Md.
Issue Dates:: 1922

36. 10036. Misbranding of Giepsi Vemela. U. S. v. 11 Bottles of Giepsi Vemela. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Giepsi Vemela Co., Douglas, Ariz.
Issue Dates:: 1922

37. 10037. Misbranding of Gold Medal compound pills. U. S. v. 31 Boxes of Gold Medal Compound Pills. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: G. P. Steyh Importing Co., St. Louis, Mo.
Issue Dates:: 1922

38. 10038. Misbranding of olive oil. U. S. v. 35 Cans of Olive Oil. Decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond.

Defendants:: N. P. Economou & Theodos, New York, N. Y.
Issue Dates:: 1922

39. 10039. Misbranding of compound oil. U. S. v. 38 One-Gallon Cans of Compound Oil. Consent decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction.

Defendants:: Nathan Tohalem and Joseph Diamond, New York, N. Y.
Issue Dates:: 1922

40. 10040. Misbranding of cottonseed meal. U. S. v. 400 Sacks of Cottonseed Meal. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and sale. Order of restoration. Product released under bond.

Defendants:: E. A. Clark & Co.
Issue Dates:: 1922