FDA Notices of Judgment Collection, 1908-1966

Search

Search Constraints

Start Over You searched for: Adjudicating Courts Eastern District of Missouri ✖Remove constraint Adjudicating Courts: Eastern District of Missouri Issue Dates November 8, 1922 ✖Remove constraint Issue Dates: November 8, 1922 Collections Foods and Drugs, 1908-1943 ✖Remove constraint Collections: Foods and Drugs, 1908-1943 Defendants Edward G. Hammell and John B. Rueschhoff, a partnership, trading as the Ideal Dairy Co., St. Louis, Mo., and having a receiving station at Coulterville, Ill. ✖Remove constraint Defendants: Edward G. Hammell and John B. Rueschhoff, a partnership, trading as the Ideal Dairy Co., St. Louis, Mo., and having a receiving station at Coulterville, Ill. Titles 10621. Adulteration of milk. U. S. v. Edward G. Hammell and John B. Rueschhoff (Ideal Dairy Go.). Plea of guilty by John B. Rueschhoff. Fine, $50 and costs. Counts 2 and 3 of indictment dismissed as to Edward G. Hammell, who pleaded nolo contendere and was fined $25 and costs. ✖Remove constraint Titles: 10621. Adulteration of milk. U. S. v. Edward G. Hammell and John B. Rueschhoff (Ideal Dairy Go.). Plea of guilty by John B. Rueschhoff. Fine, $50 and costs. Counts 2 and 3 of indictment dismissed as to Edward G. Hammell, who pleaded nolo contendere and was fined $25 and costs.
1 entry found
Number of results to display per page

Search Results

Refine by:

  • 10621. Adulteration of milk. U. S. v. Edward G. Hammell and John B. Rueschhoff (Ideal Dairy Go.). Plea of guilty by John B. Rueschhoff. Fine, $50 and costs. Counts 2 and 3 of indictment dismissed as to Edward G. Hammell, who pleaded nolo contendere and was fined $25 and costs.✖[remove]1
  • Edward G. Hammell and John B. Rueschhoff, a partnership, trading as the Ideal Dairy Co., St. Louis, Mo., and having a receiving station at Coulterville, Ill.✖[remove]1