FDA Notices of Judgment Collection, 1908-1966

Search

Start Over Titles 3382. Suit for injunction to restrain prosecution of pending seizures of Nutrilite Food Supplement; to enjoin institution of additional seizures; and to test constitutionality of Section 304 (a) of the Act and administrative action taken thereunder. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc., v. Oscar R. Ewing, Paul B. Dunbar, Charles W. Crawford, Louis D. Elliott, George P. Larrick, and Tom C. Clark. Motion for dismissal denied; defendants' petition to Supreme Court for writ of prohibition denied. Tried before three-judge court. Decree of permanent injunction; decree reversed upon appeal to Supreme Court. ✖Remove constraint Titles: 3382. Suit for injunction to restrain prosecution of pending seizures of Nutrilite Food Supplement; to enjoin institution of additional seizures; and to test constitutionality of Section 304 (a) of the Act and administrative action taken thereunder. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc., v. Oscar R. Ewing, Paul B. Dunbar, Charles W. Crawford, Louis D. Elliott, George P. Larrick, and Tom C. Clark. Motion for dismissal denied; defendants' petition to Supreme Court for writ of prohibition denied. Tried before three-judge court. Decree of permanent injunction; decree reversed upon appeal to Supreme Court. Defendants Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc. ✖Remove constraint Defendants: Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc. Issue Dates August 1951 ✖Remove constraint Issue Dates: August 1951

Refine by:

  • 3382. Suit for injunction to restrain prosecution of pending seizures of Nutrilite Food Supplement; to enjoin institution of additional seizures; and to test constitutionality of Section 304 (a) of the Act and administrative action taken thereunder. Mytinger & Casselberry, Inc., v. Oscar R. Ewing, Paul B. Dunbar, Charles W. Crawford, Louis D. Elliott, George P. Larrick, and Tom C. Clark. Motion for dismissal denied; defendants' petition to Supreme Court for writ of prohibition denied. Tried before three-judge court. Decree of permanent injunction; decree reversed upon appeal to Supreme Court.1