85. Misbranding of Camelline.    IT. S. v. 9 Dozen Bottles of Camelllne.    Default
decree of condemnation and destruction. (F. D. C. No. 6948. Sample No. 
63431-E.)
On March 7, 1942, the United States attorney for the District of Oregon filed 
a libel against the above-named product at Portland, Oreg., alleging that it had 
been shipped on or about August 28, 1941, by Walter M. Willett from San 
Francisco, Calif.; and charging that it was misbranded.
. Analyses of samples of the article showed that it consisted essentially of 
calcium carbonate, bismuth subcarbonate, alcohol, and water.
The article was alleged to be misbranded in that statements in an accompany- 
ing circular suggesting and representing that when used as directed, it was a 
natural aid to beauty and greater charm, would keep the skin delicate and 
youthful, would preserve the youthful creamy appearance of the skin, ? was a 
stimulating lotion, would protect the skin against wind and sun, "was beauty 
and youth," would protect the face against the ravages of weather, and would 
prevent the disagreeable effects of exposure to the sun and wind, were false and 
misleading since it would not accomplish such results.
It also was alleged to be misbranded under the provisions of the law applicable 
to drugs, as reported in notices of judgment published on drugs and devices.
On April 13,1942, no claimant having appeared, judgment of condemnation was 
entered and the product was ordered destroyed.