187. Adulteration and misbranding of brilliantine color-odors. U. S. v, Or bis 
Products Corp. and William BL Barlow. Pleas of guilty. Defendants 
jointly fined $450. (P. D. C. No. 24249. Sample Nos. 45101-H, 77384-H, 
77385-H.)
INFORMATION FILED: August 19, 1949, Southern District of New York, against 
the Orbis Products Corp., New York, N. Y., and William H. Barlow.
ALLEGED VIOLATION : The defendants without proper authority used labels and 
identification devices authorized by the regulations for color certification. 
These labels and identification devices were attached to bottles containing 
certain coal-tar colors.
On or about September 12, 1946, and March 19,1947, the defendants caused 
the coal-tar colors so labeled and identified to be introduced into interstate 
commerce at New York, N. Y., for delivery to Los Angeles, Calif., and Boone, 
Iowa.
LABEL, IN PART: "Brilliantine Color-Odor Series No. 300 Color Bed Odor 
Rose Contains 1%% Pure Coal Tar Dye Part of Certified Lot No. B-5800," 
"Brilliantine Color-Odor Series No. 300 Color Amber Odor Rose Con- 
tains 1.2% Pure Coal Tar Dye Part of Certified Lot No. B-2364," and "Brillian- 
tine Color-Odor Color Amber Odor Apple Blossom Contains 1.2% Pure 
Coal Tar Dye   Part of Certified Lot No. B-2364."
RESULTS OF INVESTIGATION: The identification devices "Lot No. B-2364" and 
"Lot No. B-5800" had been assigned for use on certain batches of certified coal- 
tar colors, but the colors shipped in interstate commerce and labeled by the 
defendants with such devices were not from the certified batches.
NATURE OF CHARGE: Adulteration, Section 601 (e), the products were not hair 
dyes and contained coal-tar colors other than ones from batches that had been 
certified in accordance with the regulations 
Misbranding, Section 602 (a), the labels of the articles falsely represented 
that they contained coal-tar colors from batches that had been certified in 
accordance with the regulations.
DISPOSITION: December 13, 1949. Pleas of guilty having been ^ntered, the 
defendants jointly were fined ?450.
S. Adulteration and misbranding of character make-up kits.    U. S. v. 343 
Boxes   *   *   *.    (F. D. C. No. 30328.   Sample No. 74910-K.)
LIBEL FILED :   December 8,1950, District of New Jersey.
ALLEGED SHIPMENT : On or about October 17,20,23, and 24,1950, by Smith & Mots, 
from Philadelphia, Pa.
PRODUCT: 343 boxes each containing 12 character make-up kits at Irvington, 
N.J.
LABEL, IN PART :   "Professional Character Make-Up."
NATURE OF CHARGE: Adulteration, Section 601 (e), the product was not a hair 
dye and bore or contained a coal-tar color other than one from a batch that had 
been certified in accordance with the regulations.
Misbranding, Sections 602 (b) (1) and (2), the product was a cosmetic in 
package form and failed to bear a label containing the name and place of 
business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor, and an accurate state- 
ment of the quantity of the contents.
DISPOSITION : January 22, 1951. Default decree of condemnation and destruc- 
tion.