997. Misbranding: of Thompson's Dally Vitamin and Mineral Ration. TJ. S. v. 8 Cartons of Thompson's Daily Vitamin and Mineral Ration. Consent de- cree of condemnation. Product ordered released under bond for relabel- ing:. (F. D. C. No. 9040. Sample No. 13242-F.) This product was represented in its labeling as supplying 1? times the mini- mum adult daily requirements of vitamins A and D, the minimum adult daily requirement of vitamin C and riboflavin, and 3 times the minimum adult daily requirement of vitamin Bi. It was also represented as containing specified amounts of vitamin B?, niacin amide, pantothenic acid, and biotin, as well as calcium, phosphorus, iodine, iron, and copper. On December 24, 1942, the United States attorney for the Western District of Washington filed a libel against 8 cartons, each containing 100 boxes, of the above named product at Seattle, Wash., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce on or about October 12, 15, and 20, 1942, from Los Angelesv Calif., by the William T. Thompson Co.; and charging that it was misbranded. The article was alleged to be mlsbfanded in that the statements appearing on the display card accompanying the article, "Vitamins For Vitality Improve your health! . . . Take the drudgery out of work . . . Put more pep in your play . . . ^ Reduce colds . . . Cut down fatigue . . . Improve appetite and digestion . Build nervous stability . . . Prevent impaired eyesight due to Vitamin defi- ciencies . . . Build up your blood count . . . Prevent dental cavities, bleeding gums, due to deficiencies of Vitamins D, C, and Calcium," were false and mislead- ing since such statements represented and suggested that the article would be effective for the purposes and conditions stated and implied, whereas it would not. be so effective. The article was also alleged to be misbranded under the provisions of law applicable to foods as reported in the notices of judgment on foods. On January 14, 1943, William T. Thompson Co., claimant, having admitted the allegations of the libel, judgment of condemnation was entered and the product was ordered released under bond for relabeling under the supervision of the Food and Drug Administration. VETERINARY USE*