1101. Misbranding; of intrauterine paste. U. S. v.* Anne SI. .Jenks (Dependon Products and Jenks Physicians Supplies). Plea of guilty. Fine, $200 and imprisonment for 9 months. (F. D. C. No. 9627. Sample Nos. 16897-E, 16898-E, 22384-E, 22398-E.) On June 29, 1943, the grand jurors for the District of Minnesota returned an indictment against Anne M. Jenks, doing business as Dependon Products and "Jenks" Physicians Supplies, St. Paul, Minn., alleging shipment from the State of Minnesota into the States of Missouri and California within the period from on or about September 16 to November 19, 1941, of quantities of the above- named products, which was misbranded. Analysis disclosed that the article consisted essentially of potassium iodide, soap, alcohol, and water, and that it contained no free iodine. The article in one of the Missouri lots and one of the California lots was alleged to be misbranded in that the statements in its labeling, "Intrauterine Paste * * * Caution-To be used only by a physician with adequate and > For omission of, or unsatisfactory, inpredients statement, see Nos. 1103,1104; omission of name and place of business of manufacturer, packer, or distributor, No. 1104; failure to bear accurate statement of quantity of contents, No. 1104; inconspicuousness of required label information, No. 1105; cosmetic, subject to the drug provisions of the Act, No. 1133. 2 See also No. 1139 for abortifacient also alleged to be unsafe and dangerous. 636099-45 1 271 continuous supervision and employing modern surgical asespis," Vere false and misleading since such statements represented and suggested thatthe^article would be safe and appropriate for injection into the uterine cavity, whergas .the article, whether used by a physician with adequate and continued supervision and em- ploying modern surgical asepsis or otherwise, would not be safe and appropriate for injection into the uterine cavity, but would be unsafe and dangerous when used for such purpose, and was capable of producing serious and even fatal consequences. The article in the remainder of the California and Missouri lots was alleged to be misbranded in that it was dangerous to health when used in the dosage or with the frequency or duration prescribed, recommended, or suggested in its labeling. This portion of the Missouri lots was alleged to be misbranded further (1) in that the statements appearing in its labeling, "Intrauterine Paste * * * Caution- To be used only by a physician with adequate and continuous supervision and employing modern surgical asespis," and "For Induction of Labor * * * For Incomplete Miscarriage," were false and misleading since they represented and suggested that the article would be safe and appropriate for injection into the uterine cavity for purposes of inducing labor, terminating pregnancy, or remov- ing retained portions of the products of conception, whereas the article, whether used by a physician with adequate and continued supervision and employing modern surgical asepsis or otherwise, would not be safe and appropriate for such purposes, but would be unsafe and dangerous and was capable of producing serious and even fatal consequences; and (2) in that the statements on the labeling, "For Dysmenorrhea * * * For Endometritis, Cervical and Uterine Discharges" were false and misleading since the article would not be an effective medicament for the treatment of dysmenorrhea, endometritis, or cervical or uterine discharges. On September 11,1943, the defendant entered a plea of guilty, and on November 2,1943, the court imposed a fine of $200 and a sentence of 9 months in jail.