1747. Misbranding: of Floxspray, Poultry Inhalant.    U. S. v. 13 Bottles of Flox
spray, Poultry" Inhalant.    Default decree of condemnation and destruc-
tion.   (F. D. C. No.^9213.   Sample No. 4624-H.)
LIBEL FILED:   February 13,1946, Eastern District of Pennsylvania.
AT.T.EQED SHIPMENT : On or about January 14,1946, by the Fox Co., from Newfield,
N.J.
PRODUCT: 3 1-gallon bottles and 10 1-quart bottles of Floxspray, Poultry In-
halant at Doylestown, Pa. Examination pf a sample showed that the product
consisted essentially of mineral oil, with some pine oil, eucalyptus oil, and
camphor. The label of the product did not bear a declaration of the quantity
of the contents.
NATURE or CHARGE : Misbranding, Section 502 (a), certain label statements were
false and misleading since they represented and suggested that the product
would be effective in the treatment and prevention of colds in baby chicks
and mature poultry, whereas the article would not be effective for those pur-
poses; and, Section 502 (b) (2), the article failed to bear a label containing
an accurate statement of the quantity of the contents.
DISPOSITION : March 14, 1946. No claimant having appeared, judgment of con-
demnation was entered and the product was ordered destroyed.