FOOD AND DRUG ADMINISTRATION NOTICES OF JUDGMENT UNDER THE FEDERAL FOOD, DRUG, AND COSMETIC ACT [Given pursuant to section 705 of the Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act] 4441-4460 DRUGS AND DEVICES The cases reported herewith were instituted in the United States district courts by the United States attorneys, acting upon reports submitted by the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, and include, where indicated, the results of investigations by the Department, prior to the institution of the proceedings. Published by direction of the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare. GEO. P. LARRICK, Commissioner of Food and Drugs. WASHINGTON, D. C, August 19, 1955. CONTENTS* Page Violative sales of prescription drugs 392 Drugs and devices actionable be- cause of failure to bear ade- quate directions or warning statements 395 Page Drugs actionable because of devia- tion from official or own stand- ards 398 Drugs and devices actionable be- cause of false and misleading claims 398 ?For failure to comply with the packaging requirements of an official compendium, see No. 4457. 351065?55 391 VIOLATIVE SALES OF PRESCRIPTION DRUGS 4441. Misbranding of amphetamine sulfate tablets. U. S. v. Circle Drug Store (a partnership), -William Mexic, -Sam Mexic, *and^ W411iam* E. Kugler. Plea of not guilty for Sam Mexic and pleas of nolo contendere for other defendants. Fine of $500 against partnership, $500 against William Mexic, and $250 against William E. Eugler. Sam Mexic tried to the court and found not guilty. (F. D. C. No. 35120. Sample Nos. 69011-L, 69012-L.) INFORMATION FILED : June 2, 1953, Eastern District of Louisiana, against the Circle Drug Store, a partnership, New Orleans, La., and against William Mexic and Sam Mexic, partners in the partnership, and William E. Kugler, a pharma- cist for the partnership. NATURE OF CHARGE: On or about February 5 and 12, 1953, while a number of amphetamine sulfate tablets were being held for sale at the Circle Drug Store, after shipment in interstate commerce, various quantities of the drug were dispensed without a prescription from a practitioner licensed by law to ad- minister such drug. The partnership, William Mexic, and Sam Mexic were charged with causing the acts of dispensing involved in each of the 2 counts of the information, and William E. Kugler was joined as a defendant in count 2 of the information. Such acts of dispensing were alleged to be contrary to Section 503 (b) (1) and to result in the dispensed drug being misbranded. DISPOSITION : Sam Mexic entered a plea of not guilty, and the other defendants entered pleas of nolo contendere. On August 26,1953, the court fined the part- nership $500, William Mexic $500, and William E. Kugler $250. On July 1, 1954, the case against Sam Mexic came on for trial before the court without a jury. The trial was concluded on the same day, with the return of a verdict of not quilty for Sam Mexic.