6912. Various prescription drugs.    (F.D.C. No. 45932.    S. Nos. 36-112 R, 36-
114/18 R.) 
QUANTITY :   2 ctns., 3 shopping bags, and 8,149 btls., pkgs., and/or boxes, having
an approximate total value of $5,000, at Palisades Park, N.J., in possession
of Marshel Sales Oo. ('Samuel Udin). 
SHIPPED :    On unknown dates, by various drug handlers. 
LABEL IN PART:    (Some labels)   "Complimentary," "Physician's Sample," or
similar wording,     "y    *
RESULTS OF INVESTIGAL ->N : Some of the articles were unlabeled bottles which 
had been repacked by the dealer from physicians' samples received from 
various drug manufacturers' salesmen from outside the State of New Jersey. 
Some of the articles consisted of quantities of prescription drugs originally 
intended for use as samples for physicians and others lawfully engaged in 
?dispensing prescription drugs, and bearing labels containing "Caution: Federal 
law prohibits dispensing without prescription" and the words "Complimen- 
tary," "Physicians Sample," or similar wording, and the names and addresses 
of manufacturers, packers, or distributors located outside the 'State of New 
Jersey.
LIBELED :    6-9-61, Dist. N.J.; amended libel 6-13-61.
CHARGE: 502(a)-while held for sale, the statements "Complimentary," 
"Physicians Sample," and similar wording borne on the labels of the articles 
of drug which had not yet been repacked by the dealer were false and mis- 
leading as applied to such articles in possession of a repacker and intended 
for sale and not intended for use as "complimentary-not for sale" samples 
for physicians and others lawfully engaged in dispensing prescription drugs ; 
502(b)-the repacked articles of drug failed to bear a label containing (1) the
*See also Nos. 6901, 6904, 6908.
name and place of business of the manufacturer, packer, or distributor, and 
(2) an accurate statement of the quantity of the contents; 502(e) (1)-the 
repacked articles of drug failed to bear the common or usual name of the drug; 
502(f) (1)-the labeling of the repacked articles of drug failed to bear ade- 
quate directions for use, and the articles were not exempt from that require- 
ment since they were drugs subject to the provisions of 503(b) (1) and their 
labels failed to bear an identifying lot number as required by regulations; 
503(b) (4)-the repacked articles of drug failed to bear the statement 
"Caution: Federal law prohibits dispensing without prescription." 
DISPOSITION :    7-26-61.   Default-destruction.