NOTICE OF JUDGMENT NO. 2608. (Given pursuant to section 4 of the Food and Drugs Act.) V. S. v. Ten Barrels Tomato Catsup. Decree of condemnation by consent. Product released on bond. MISBRANDING OF TOMATO CATSUP. On November 22, 1912, the United States Attorney for the Eastern District of Louisiana, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agri- culture, filed in the District Court of the United States for said dis- trict a libel for the seizure and condemnation of 10 barrels of tomato catsup remaining unsold in the original unbroken packages and in possession of Blaise Ueberschlag, New Orleans, La., alleging that the product had been shipped on or about October 19 and October 26, 1912, by the Price & Lucas Cider & Vinegar Co., Louisville, Ky., and transported from the State of Kentucky into the State of Louisiana, and charging misbranding in violation of the Food and Drugs Act. The product was labeled: "Kentucky Belle Tomato Catsup, (picture of large red ripe tomato) Contains 1/10 of 1% Benzoate of Soda Price and Lucas Cider and Vinegar Co., Inc., Louisville, Ky. Guar- anteed Serial No. 3390." There were also pencil figures on barrels indicating the number of gallons, as follows: 54, 40, 41, 54, 54, 54, 54, 41, 54, 54. Misbranding of the product was alleged in 1 e libel for the reason that it was in package form, that is, in barre , and the contents of said barrels were stated in-terms of measure on the outside thereof, but were not correctly stated, in that the contents as stated by the label and numerals on each barrel were as set forth above, while in truth and in fact said barrels, when gauged, were found to contain, in the same order in which their branded contents appear above, respectively, the following number of gallons: 50, 35, 38, 46, 52, 49, 49, 36, 51, 51; and said shortage in contents existed at the time of interstate ship- ment. On March 5, 1913, the said Price & Lucas Cider & Vinegar Co., claimant, having admitted the allegations in the libel and consented 11998°—No. 2608—13 thereto, a decree of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product should be released to said claimant upon the payment of the costs of the proceedings and the execution of bond in the sum of $200 in conformity with section 10 of the Act. B. T. GALLOWAY, Acting Secretary of Agriculture. WASHINGTON, D. C, September 19,1913. 2608 o