5546, Misbr.aauli~g •IOL u ~-lMl,'lgh Di,.phffaeda R-e;uu~d-:y " aft-a a,U,e~ ~ brRft414-ng of '" Leca<11 0Gt'" " Bll@:od Pmrifier,," ",Cn;ntre.r Powder," 'f Liniinent," "Ruptull"e Piowder,"-" "DraPWiag 8:inhnem:i:.,~' and "Oanke~ Syru~" U. S. • * * v. Greenhalgh R~Jtt,edy Co., a corporation. Plea of guilty to count 1. of the information. Fi"ne, ijr.100. 8-tker eouu:v, of itd'oll"!IB1tilt-i-0n cli'Mnik!imed. (F. & D. No. 7450. I. S. Nos. 174S9-k, 17440--k;, 1:7441-k, l74-it~-k. 17!1"44--4;:, 1744S-k, 1744~-k, 17451-:k.) On SepcWEi!l.&er 5, 191-6, tm.e U,raited States attorney for .the Di:Str1ct f}f U~h, acting upe,n a rep,ert by the Seeraetal';f of Agri:eult'lJl.rse, tned b1. the 1Mstll1ct ~rt of the United Stat-es f-{}r sai-d -dh,t.ri-ct an ir:.tt~rm.-ati-0in against the ,Oreen.halg1ll Remedy Co., a eorpontion, Salt Lakce C1.ty, Utah, a11eging shipment by sti.i€1 company, in violation of the Food and Drugs Act, as am-en~d, -011 1)1' ab-eu.t September 21, 1'914, from th:e State or Utah int,9 the State of California, (l)f a quantity of -att aTti-de label-ed in part, "Greenhalgh Diphth-eri'a Remedy," wnieh was misbranaed. Analysis of a sample of the article by the Bureau of Chemistry -0f -tki-s -de-partment s-h-ow-ed that it w-as ess~ntiaUy ~ mirtnre of sntp-h:nr, bMa:g:, tra-ee of ~tarch, plant ti-sBue carrymg ooroo·ine; iron, aluminium, and po-ta-ssiurn, as sulphates and nitrates ; -charcoal and traees -of manga-ne~ dio:rld in-dica't-ed. It was alleged in substance in the information that the article was misbranded for the reason that C'e'l'W.in st-atemt>nt-s ai,peariag on its labels falsely &fld fraudulently repreS'-enred it as a remedy for diphtheria and as a ctlre for sore throat and croup, WB.-en, in truth il.nd in fa-et, it was not. On February 24, 1917, the a-et-end.ant company -ent~red a p1ea of guilty to the first count of the informati