7503. Misbranding of " Grimaiilt & Co's. Injection." V. S. * * * v. 24 Bottles * * * Grimault ?fc Go's. Injection. Default decree of con- demnation, forfeiture, and destruction. (F. & D. No. 10791. I. S. No. 6982-r. S. No. C-1330J On July 14, 1919, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of Wis- consin, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the Dis- trict Court of the United States for said district a libel for the seizure and con- demnation of 24 bottles containing a drug solution or product called " Grimault & Go's. Injection," remaining unsold in the original unbroken packages at Milwaukee, Wis., alleging that the article had been shipped on or about August 4, 1917, by E. Fougera & Co., Kew York, N. Y., and transported from the State of New York into the State of Wisconsin, and charging misbranding in violation of the Food and Drugs Act, as amended. The article was labeled in part: (Wrap- per) " Grimault and Co's. Injection * * * The Matico plant * * * has been found to have remarkable preventive * * * properties;" (circular) "Matico Injection * * * prepared by Grimault and Co. * * * Matico * * * in the treatment of chronic and acute discharges from the urethra * * * when taken internally acts especially well on all muco-purulent dis- charges ; * * * our injection * * * employed for several years with prompt and satisfactory results; * * * we sought for some time in the vegetable kingdom a substance that would meet the following requirements; rapid cure without fear of disturbances * * * after numerous investigations we decidec. on the Matico * * * the tests * * * confirmed our specu- lati ns, producing wonderful results * * * under its influence recent or old blennerrhagic discharges, even those that resisted other treatments, disappear rapidly * * * Directions for using Matico Injection in cases of Blennor- rhagia and Gonorrhoea for men ? * * * Directions for use in women in cases of catarrh, leucorrhoea * * * Directions for using Matico Injection as a Prophylactic and Preservative." Misbranding of the article was alleged in substance in the libel for the reason that the product consisted of a dilute aqueous solution containing small amounts of copper sulphate and plant extractives, with matico indicated, and that the statements, appearing on the bottles and contained in the circular wrapped and enclosed with the article, representing it as a treatment or prophylactic for blennorrhcea, gonorrhoea, catarrh, leucorrhoea, and certain other diseases, were fakd and fraudulent in that the article did not contain any ingredient or combination of ingredients capable of producing the results or effects claimed by said labels, wrappers, and circulars, and that said statements were false and fraudulent in that the product or solution contained no in- gredient or combination of ingredients capable of producing the curative or therapeutic effects claimed for ]t on the labels, wrappers, and circulars. On August 6, 1919, no claimant having appeared for the property, judgment of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be destroyed by the United States marshal. E. D. BALL, Acting Secretary of AgricuUtire.