7838. Adulteration and 'mislnanilinf? of canned tomatoes. * U. S. * * * v. 2,132 Oases of Canned Tomatoes. Consent Hv-ov^e: of condemnation and forfeiture. Prod net released on bond. (F. & D. No. 12072. I. S. Nost 9091-r, 9092-r. S. No. C-1G80.) On January 17, 1920, the United States, attorney for the Eastern District of Missouri, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed, in the District Court of the United States for said district a libel for the seizure and condemnation of ?,132 cases of canned tomatoes, remaining unsold in the original unbroken packages at St. Louis, Mo., alleging that the article had been shipped on October 31, 1919, and November 3, 1919, by the Chino Canning Co., Chino, Calif., and 'transported from the State of California into the State of Missouri, and charging adulteration and misbranding in violation of the Food and Drugs Act. Adulteration of the article was alleged in the libel in that tomato pulp had been mixed and- packed with, and substituted in part for, canned tomatoes. Misbranding of the-article was alleged in the libel in that the statements on the label on the cans containing the article, to wit, '? La Segunda Brand Table Quality Tomatoes " (picture of whole tomato) " California Grown with Pure Tomato Juice Where Everything Grows Chino Canning Company Chino Calif. Net Contents 1 lb. 12 oz," were false and misleading, and deceived and misled the purchaser into the belief that the product consisted wholly of tomatoes, whereas it contained tomato pulp. It was further misbranded in that the product was an imitation of, and sold under the distinctive name of, another article. On March 10, 1920, the Chino Canning Co., Chino, Calif., having consented to n decree, judgment of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be delivered to the claimant on the pay- ment of the costs of the proceeding and the execution of a bond, in conformity with section 10 of the act. E. D. BALL, Acting1 Secreiahj of Agriculture.