8175.?Misbranding of Bourbon Hog- Cliolera Remedy. V. S. * * * v. ? Gallon Packages, 3 Half-gallon Packages, ami 8 Quart Bottles,? More or IJCSS, of Bourbon Hog Cholera Remedy.'' Default decree of? condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. (V. & D. No. 11870.? I. S. No. 7379-r. S. No. C-14&7.) On September 29, 1919, the United States attorney for the Northern District? of Ohio, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, hied in the Dis?? trict Court of the United States for said district a libel for the seizure and con?? demnation of a certain quantity of a certain article, labeled in part " Bourbon? Hog Cholera Remedy," at Kenton, Ohio, alleging that the article had been? shipped on or about September 3, 1919, by the Bourbon Remedy Co., Lexington,? Ky., and transported from the Stqte of Kentucky into the State of Ohio, and? charging misbranding in violation'of the Food and Drugs Act, as amended. Analysis of a sample of the article by the Bureau of Chemistry of this depart?? ment showed that it consisted of an acid aqueous solution containing essen?? tially aloes, copper sulphate, ferrous sulphate, magnesium sulphate, and free? sulphuric acid, flavored with safrol and colored with aniline dye. 126 BUREAU OP CHEMISTRY. ' t Supplement 94, Misbranding of the article was alleged in substance in the libel for the reason? that certain statements appearing on the cartons enclosing, the folder accom?? panying, and on the labels of the packages containing the article, regarding its? curative or therapeutic effects, falsely and fraudulently represented that the? article was effective as a remedy for cholera, worms, scours, cough, and thumps? in hogs, and as a powerful internal germicide, whereas, in truth and in fact, it? was not effective. On January 3, 1920, no claimant having appeared for-the property, judgment? of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court? that the product be destroyed by the United States marshal. E. D. BALL, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.