9004. Adulteration and Misbranding of tomatoes. U. S. * * * v. 350 Cases of Tomatoes. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product ordered cisleased on bond. (F. & D. Nos. 11871, 11872, 11873. I. S. No. 13989-r. S. No. E-1922.) On January 7, 1920, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of New York, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for said district a libel for the seizure and condemnation of 350 cases of canned tomatoes, remaining unsold in the original unbroken packages at Brooklyn,' N. Y., alleging that the article had been shipped by Charles Webster, from Sharps^ town, Md., and transported from the State of Maryland into rheostat of New York, the consignment arriving between December 3, 1919, and December 11, 1919, and charging adulteration and misbranding in violation of the Food and Drugs Act. The article was labeled in part, "Rose Hill Brand Tomatoes. Packed by Chas. Webster, at East New Market, Md." Adulteration of the article was alleged in the libel for the reason that added water had been mixed and packed with and substituted wholly or in part for tomatoes. Misbranding was alleged in substance for the reason that the package .or label of the article bore statements, designs, and devices regarding said, article or the ingredients or substances contained therein, to wit, "Rose Hill Brand Tomatoes," and a cut of a whole ripe tomato, which were false and misleading and deceived and misled the purchaser, and for the further reason that the said article was an imitation of, and offered for sale under the distinctive name of, another and different-article. On March 3, 1920, the said Charles Webster, claimant, having admitted the truth of the allegations of the libel and consented to a decree, judgment of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be released to said claimant upon the payment of the costs of the proceedings and the execution of a bond in the sum of $900, in conformity with section 10 of the act, conditioned in part that the product be relabeled by said claimant at his own expense, under the supervision of this department. E. D. BALL, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.