0400. Misbranding of Beecham's Pills. V. S. * * * v. 36 Dozen Pack- ages of * * * Beechani's Pills. Consent decree of condemna- tion and fox fclture. Product released under bond. (F. & D. No. 11050. I. S. No. 2989-r. S. No. W-471.) On August 25, 1919, the United States attorney for the Southern District of California, acting upon a report by the. Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for said district a libel for the seizure and condemnation of 36 dozen packages of Beecham's Pills, remaining unsold in the original unbroken packages at Los Angeles, Calif., alleging that the article had been shipped by the B. F. Allen Co., New York, N. Y., on June 27, 1919, BUREAU OF CHEMISTRY. [Supplement 118.] and transported from the State of New York into the State of California, and charging misbranding in violation of the Food and Drugs Act, as amended. Analysis of a sample of the article by the Bureau of Chemistry of this de- partment showed that the pills consisted essentially of aloes and ginger, and were coated with talc. Misbranding of the article was alleged in substance in the libel for the reason that the following therapeutic effects were claimed for it in a circular inclosed in each package containing the said article, to wit, that it was a cure for, or remedy in the treatment of, the blood, nerves, bilious disorders, indiges- tion, want of appetite, fullness after meals, vomiting, sickness at the stomach, torpid liver, sick headache, cold chills, flushing of heat, lowness of spirits, etc., for attacks of headache, dizziness or swimming in the head, wind pain and spasms at the stomach, pains in the back, restlessness, insomnia, etc., scurvy, pimples, blotches of the skin, ulcers, etc., kidney and urinary disorders, gout, rheumatism, sciatica, eczema, etc., which claims and statements were false and fraudulent in that the contents of the said packages contained no ingredient or combination of ingredients capable of producing the effects claimed. On September 16, 1919, the B. F. Allen Co., New York, N. Y., claimant, having confessed judgment and consented to a decree, judgment of condemna- tion and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be released to said claimant upon payment of the costs of the pro- ceedings and the execution of a bond in the sum of $100, in conformity with section 10 of the act, conditioned in part that the product be relabeled under the supervision of this department. E. D. BALL, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.