9589. Adulteration and Misbranding of vinegar. IT. S. * * * v. 51 Bar¬ rels, 7 Barrels, and 3 Barrels of * * * Vinegar. Default de- crees of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. (F. & D. Nos. 14139, 14158, 14240. I. S. Nos. 8201-t, 5827-t. Inv. No. 24405. S. Nos. F^-3037, E-3045, Er-3059.) On January 5, 8, and 24, 1921, respectively, the United States attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania, acting upon reports by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for said district libels for the seizure and condemnation of 51 barrels, 7 barrels, and 3 barrels of vinegar, remaining unsold in the original unbroken packages at Scranton, Lock Haven, and Galeton, Pa., respectively, alleging that the 3 barrels thereof had been shipped from Elmira, N. Y., on or about September 29, 1920, and that the remainder had been shipped by the Naas Cider & Vinegar Co., Inc., Co- hocton, N. Y., on or about August 7 and September 16, 1920, respectively, and that the various consignments had been transported from the State of New York into the State of Pennsylvania, and charging adulteration and misbrand- ing in violation of the Food and Drugs Act. The article was labeled in part, (barrel) "Pure Cider Vinegar Steuben Brand Made From Apples * * *" Adulteration of the article was alleged in the libels for the reason that dis- tilled vinegar had been mixed and packed with, and substituted wholly or in part for, pure cider vinegar, and for the further reason that the article was mixed with distilled vinegar in a manner whereby its damage and inferiority were concealed. Misbranding was alleged for the reason that the statement on the label, " Pure Cider Vinegar * * * Made From Apples," was false and misleading and deceived and misled the purchaser in that the product was not pure cider vinegar made from apples. Misbranding was alleged for the further reason that the said article was an imitation of, and was offered for sale under the distinctive name of, another article, to wit, pure cider vinegar. On March 14, April 16, and June 25, 1921, respectively, no claimant having appeared for the property, judgments of condemnation and forfeiture were entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be destroyed by the United States marshal. C. W. PUGSLEY, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.