10414. Adulteration and Misbranding of vinegar. U. S. * * * v. 68 and 70 Barrels of Vinegar. Consent decrees of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released nnder bond. (F. & D. Nos. 12986, 12987. I. S. Nos. 384-r, 385-r. S. Nos. EJ-2408, Er-2409.) On July 2, 1920, the United States attorney for the District of Connecticut, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for said district libels for the seizure and con- demnation of 68 and 70 barrels of vinegar, remaining unsold in the original unbroken packages at Stamford and New Haven, Conn., respectively, alleging that the article had been shipped by F. E. Jewett & Co., Lowell, Mass., on or about May 7 and 26, 1920, respectively, and transported from the State of Massachusetts into the State of Connecticut, and charging adulteration and misbranding in violation of the Food and Drugs Act. Adulteration of the article was alleged in substance in the libels for the reason that distilled vinegar had been mixed and packed therewith so as to reduce, lower, and injuriously affect its quality and strength and had been substituted wholly or in part for the said product. Misbranding was alleged in substance for the reason that the labels on the barrels containing the article bore certain statements regarding the said article which were false and misleading; that is to say, the said labels bore the following words, " Pure Cider Vinegar Made From Apples by F. E. Jewett & Co., Lowell, Mass. Acidity reduced to not less than 4% * * *," which statements and words were intended to be of such a character as to induce the purchaser to believe that the said article was pure cider vinegar, when, in truth and in fact, it was not. Misbranding was alleged for the further reason that the article was an imitation of, and was offered for sale under the distinctive name of, another article, to wit, pure cider vinegar. On July 23 and August 16, 1921, respectively, F. E. Jewett & Co., Lowell, Mass., claimant, having consented to the entry of decrees, judgments of con- demnation and forfeiture were entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be released to the said claimant, upon payment of the costs of the proceedings and the execution of bonds in the aggregate sum of $5,459.56, in conformity with section 10 of the act. C. W. PUGST,EY, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.