12335. Misbranding- of coffee. TJ. S. v. 159 Cans of Coffee. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond (F. & D. Nos. 18456, 18457, 18480. I. S. Nos. 20618-v, 2061&-V, 20620-v. S. Nos. W-1487, W-1488, W-1489.) On March 15, 1924, the United States attorney for the District of Wyoming, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for said district a libel praying the seizure and condem- nation of 159 cans of coffee remaining unsold in the original packages at Cheyenne, Wyo., alleging that the article had been shipped by the Independ- ence Coffee and Spice Co., Denver, Colo., in various consignments, namely, on or about August 231, October 1, November 28, and December 31, 1923, respec- tively, and transported from the State of Colorado into the State of Wyoming, and charging misbranding in violation of the food and drugs act as amended. The article was labeled in part: (Can) "Breakfast Call Coffee * * * One Pound" (or "Two Pounds" or "Three Pounds") "Steel Cut * * * The Independence Coffee And Spice Co. Denver, Colo." Misbranding of the article was alleged in substance in the libel for the rea- son that the statements appearing on the respective-sized cans containing the said article, namely, " One Pound," " Two Pounds," and " Three Pounds," were false and misleading, and for the further reason that the article was so marked as to deceive and mislead the purchaser in that the said cans purported to contain 1 pound, 2 pounds, and 3 pounds, respectively, whereas, in truth and in fact, the said cans contained less amounts. Misbranding was alleged for the further reason that the article was food in package form and the quantity of the contents was not plainly and conspicuously marked on the outside of the packages in terms of weight or measure. On March 29, 1924, The Independence Coffee and Spice Co., Denver, Colo., having appeared as claimant for the property and having consented to the entry of a decree, judgment of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be released to the said claimant upon payment of the costs of the proceedings and the execution of a bond in the sum of $500, in conformity with section 10 of the act. HOWARD M. GOBE, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.