13052. Misbranding- and alleged adnlteration of tomato paste. U. S. v.392 (457) Cases of Tomato Paste. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released nnder bond to be relabeled. (F. & D. No. 19219. I. S. No. 19061-v. S. No. C-4547.) On December 8, 1924, the United States attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for said district a libel praying the seizure and condemnation of 457 cases of tomato paste, remaining in the original un- broken packages at Chicago, Ill., alleging that the article had been shipped by the Hershel California Fruit Products Co., from San Jose, Calif., Octo- ber 22, 1924, and transported from the State of California into the State of Illinois, and charging adulteration and misbranding in violation of the food and drugs act. The article was labeled in part: (Can) "Naples Style Tomato Sauce Contadina Brand * * * Packed By Hershel Cal. Fruit Prod. Co. * * * San Jose, Cal." ' Adulteration of the article was alleged in the libel for the reason that an artificially-colored product had been substituted wholly or in part for the said article. Misbranding was alleged for the reason that the statement " Tomato Sauce," borne on the labels, was false and misleading and deceived and misled the pur- chaser when applied to a tomato sauce or paste containing artificial color. On January 24, 1925, A. Morici, Chicago, Ill., claimant, having admitted the allegations of the libel and having consented to the entry of a decree, judgment of the court was entered, finding the product misbranded and order- ing its condemnation and forfeiture, and it was further ordered by the court that the product be released to the said claimant upon payment of the costs of the proceedings and the execution of a bond in the sum of $1,000, in con- formity with section 10 of the act, conditioned in part that it be relabeled "Artificially Colored." B. W. DTTNLAP, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.