14121. Adulteration and misbranding of butter. V. S. v. 18 Cases and 13 Cases of Butter. Consent decrees of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond. (F. & D. Nos. 20384. 20406. I. S. Nos. 5717-x, 5718-x, 5720-x. S. Nos. E-5382, E-5383.) , On August 20 and 27, 1925, respectively, the United States attorney for the Western District of Pennsylvania, acting upon reports by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for said district libels praying the seizure and condemnation of 31 cases of butter, remaining in the original unbroken packages at Pittsburgh, Pa., alleging that the article had been shipped by the Paul A. Schulze Co., from St. Louis, Mo., in part on or about August 8, 1925, and in part on or about August 15, 1925, and transported from the State of Missouri into the State of Pennsylvania, and charging adulteration and misbranding in violation of the food and drugs act as amended. A portion of the article was labeled in part: (Retail package) " One Pound Net. Mountain Grove Brand Fancy Creamery Butter 1 Lb. Net. * * * Net Weight One Pound. The contents of this package weighed one pound when packed.*' The remainder of the said article was labeled: (Retail package) " Park View Farms Creamery Country Roll * * * 2 Lbs. Net." Adulteration of the article was alleged in the libels for the reason that a substance deficient in butterfat had been mixed and packed therewith so as to reduce or lower or injuriously affect its quality or strength and had been substituted wholly or in part for the said article. Misbranding was alleged for the reason that the article was an imitation of or offered for sale under the distinctive name of another article. Mis- branding was alleged with respect to the alleged 1 pound packages of the product for the further reason that the statements, " One Pound Net," " 1 Lb. Net," "Net Weight One Pound," and "The contents of this package weighed one pound when packed," borne on the label, were false and misleading and deceived and misled the purchaser, and for the further reason that it was food in package form and the quantity of the contents was not plainly and conspicuously marked on the outside of the package, since the quantity stated was not correct. On January 15, 1926, the Paul A. Schulze Co., St. Louis, Mo., claimant, having admitted the allegations, of the libels and having consented to the entry of decrees, judgments of condemnation and forfeiture were entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be released to the said claimant upon the execution of good and sufficient bonds, conditioned in part that it be reworked, relabeled, or repacked under the supervision of this department and that the claimant , pay the costs of the proceedings. R. W. DUNLAP, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.