Misbranding of evaporated apples.    U. S. v. Gilbert Apple Products 
Co.,'Inc.     Plea of nolo contendere.     Fine, $100 and costs.     (F. & D.
E?Jn    No. 19698.    I. S. Nos. 13841-v, 17251-v, 17254-v, 17257-v, 17259-V, 17261-V.)
February 16, 1926, the United States attorney for the Western District 
%fo York, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in 
district Court of the United States for said district an information against 
Jmfoert Apple Products Co., Inc., a corporation, Rochester, N. Y., alleging 
&ent by said company, in violation of the food and drugs act, between the 
jltltmate -dates of November 21, 1,924, and January 27, 1925, from the State 
few York, in various lots, into the States of Virginia and New Jersey and 
istrict of Columbia, respectively, of quantities of evaporated apples which 
llfmisbranded. The article was labeled in part: "Monroe Brand" (or 
Ike Rite Brand" or "Cook Well Brand") "New York State Evaporated 
es Packed By Gilbert Apple Products Co. Inc. Rochester, N. Y."
?branding of the article was alleged in the information tor the reason 
he statement " Evaporated Apples," borne on the label, was false and 
iding in that the said statement represented that the article consisted 
p? of evaporated apples, and for the further reason that it was labeled as 
esaid so as to deceive and mislead the purchaser into the belief that it 
'
sted wholly of evaporated apples, whereas it did not so consist, but did 
' rJn part of excessive water. 
ipSlarch 10, 1927, a plea of nolo contendere to the information was entered 
pehaif of the defendant company, and the court imposed a fine of $100 and
W. M. JAEDINE, Secretary of Agriculture,