16171. Misbranding of cottonseed cake. V. S. v. 140 Sacks of Cottonseed Cake. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product released under bond. (F. & D. No. 23271. I. S. No. 04794. S. No. 1385.) On December 21, 1928, the United States attorney for the Southern District of Illinois, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for said district a libel praying seizure and condemnation of 140 sacks of cottonseed cake at Springfield, Ill., alleging that the article had been shipped by the Dallas Oil & Refining Co., Dallas, Tex., on jr about December 13, 1928, and transported from the State of Texas into the State of Illinois, and charging misbranding in violation of the food and drugs act. The article was labeled in part: " Climax Brand Cottonseed Cake and Meal Prime Quality Guaranteed Analysis Crude Protein not less than 43% * * * Made from Decorticated Cotton Seed for Southland Cotton Oil Com- pany * * * Paris, Texas." It was alleged in the libel that the article was misbranded in that the state- ment borne on the label, " Protein not less than 43%," was false and misleading and deceived and misled the purchaser when applied to a product containing a less amount of protein than stated on the label. On January 8, 1929, the Dallas Oil & Refining Co., Dallas, Tex., having ap- peared as claimant for the property and having consented to the entry of a decree, judgment of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be released to the said claimant upon payment of costs and the execution of a bond in the sum of $500, conditioned in part that it be relabeled under the supervision of this department. R. W. DUNLAP, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.