16389. Adulteration and Misbranding of alterative tablets, combination tablets, heart sedative tablets, phenolphthalein tablets, phe- nolphthalein compound tablets, phenacetin tablets, rheumatism tablets, and strychnine sulphate tablets. U. S. v. P. H. Mallen Co. Plea of guilty. Fine, SlOO and costs. (F. & D. No. 22531. I. S. Nos. 14251-x, 14252-x,14257-x, 14259-x,14260-x, 14261-x, 14262-x, 14266-x.) On March 16, 1928, the United States attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for said district an information against the P. II. Mallen Co., a corporation, Chicago, Ill., alleging shipment by said company, in violation of the food and drugs act, on or about July 30, 1926, from the State of Illinois into the State of Michigan, of quantities of drugs in tablet form which were adulterated and misbranded. The articles were labeled in part, respec- tively: (Bottles) "No. 1 A. Alterative * * * Arsenicum 1/60 gr. * * * Prepared By P. H. Mallen Company;" " Combination Tablets No. 87 Analgesic and Anodyne;" "No. 3 Heart Sedative * * * Glonoine 1-100 gr. * * * Tablets;" "Phenolphthalein Tablets;" "Phenolphthalein Comp. No. 209 Phenol- phthalein 1-10;" " Phenacetin 1 Grain;" " No. 200 Rheumatism Lithium Salicy- late 3 grs. Colchicine * * * Macrotin * * * Phytolaccin * * * tab- let;"" Tablets of Strychnine Sulphate * * * 1/60 Gr." It was alleged in the information that the phenolphthalein tablets were adul- terated in that the article was sold under and by a name recognized in the National Formulary and differed from the standard of strength and purity as determined by the test laid down in said formulary at the time of the investiga- tion of the article, in that each tablet contained not more than 0.813 grain of phenolphthalein and 0.1228 grain of calomel, whereas said formulary provided that phenolphthalein tablets contain 1 grain of phenolphthalein and no calomel, and the standard of strength, quality, and purity of the article was not declared on the container thereof. Adulteration of the alterative tablets was alleged for the reason that the strength of the article fell below the professed standard and quality under which it was sold, in that each tablet was represented to contain 1/60 grain of arsenicum, whereas each of said tablets contained more arsenicum than so represented, to wit, 1/21 grain of arsenicum, to wit, not less than 0.0491 grain of arsenicum. Adulteration of the remaining tablets was alleged for the reason that the strength and purity of the articles fell below the professed stand- ard and quality under which, they were sold in that each of the said combination tablets was sold as containing 3 grains of acetanilide, whereas each of said tablets contained not more than 1.83 grains of acetanilide; each of the said heart seda- tive tablets was represented to contain 1/100 grain of glonoine, whereas each of said tablets contained not more than 0.00056 grain of glonoine, i. e., approxi- mately 1/1800 grain of glonoine; each of the said phenolphthalein compound tab- lets was represented to contain 1/10 grain of phenolphthalein, whereas each of said tablets contained not more than 0.0874 grain, i. e., approximately 7/8 of 1/10 grain of phenolphthalein; each of said phenacetin tablets was represented to con- tain 1 grain of phenacetin, whereas each of said tablets contained not more than 0.7639 grain, i. e., approximately 3/4 grain of phenacetin; each of said rheuma- tism tablets was represented to contain 3 grains of lithium salicylate, whereas said tablets contained no lithium salicylate; and each of said strychnine sul- phate tablets was represented to contain 1/60 grain of strychnine sulphate, whereas each of said tablets contained not more than 0.01235 grain, i. e., ap- proximately 1/80 grain of strychnine sulphate. Misbranding of the said phenolphthalein tablets was alleged for the reason that the statement, to wit, "Phenolphthalein tablets," borne on the bottle label, was false and misleading in that it represented that the active medicinal agent of the said tablets consisted wholly of phenolphthalein, whereas the active medicinal agent of said tablets did not consist wholly of phenolphthalein but did consist in part of calomel. Misbranding of the combination tablets was alleged for the reason that they contained acetanilide and the label failed to bear a statement of the quantity and proportion of acetanilide contained therein. Misbranding of the rheumatism tablets was alleged for the reason that the statements " Lithium Salicylate 3 grs. * * * tablet " and " Lithium Salicy- late, Colchicine, Macrotin, Phytolaccin," borne on the bottle labels, were false and misleading in that the said statements represented that the said tablets each contained 3 grains of lithium salicylate and were composed of lithium salicylate, colchicine, macrotin, and phytolaccin, whereas the article was not so composed, but was composed of colchicine, macrotin, phytolaccin, and lithium carbonate, and contained no lithium salicylate. Misbranding of the remaining tablets was alleged for the reason that the statements, "Arsenicum 1-60 gr. * * * tablets," with respect to the alterative tablets, " Glonoine 1-100 gr. * * * tablets," with respect to the heart sedative tablets, " Phenolphthalein 1-10 gr. * * * tablets," with respect to the phenolphthalein compound tablets. " Phenacetin 1 Grain," with respect to the phenacetin tablets, and " Tablets of Strychnine Sulphate * * * 1/60 Gr.," with respect to the strychnine sul- phate tablets, borne on the respective labels, were false and misleading in that the said statements represented that the articles contained 1/60 grain of arseni- cum, 1/100 grain of glonoine, 1/10 grain of phenolphthalein, 1 grain of phenace- tin, or 1/60 grain of strychnine sulphate, as the case might be, whereas the said alterative tablets contained more than 1/60 grain of arsenicum; the said heart sedative tablets contained less than 1/100 grain of glonoine, the said phenol- phthalein compound tablets contained less than 1/10 grain of phenolphthalein, the said phenacetin tablets contained less than 1 grain of phenacetin, and the said strychnine sulphate tablets contained less than 1/60 grain of strychnine sulphate. On May 1, 1929, a plea of guilty to the information was entered on behalf of the defendant company, and the court imposed a fine of $100 and costs. ARTHUR M. HYDE, Secretary of Agricultwe.