16604. Adulteration of frozen eggs. TJ. S. v. 605 Cans of Frozen Eggl 
Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Product wf 
leased under bond.     (F. & D. No. 23785.    I. g. No. 03072.    S, No. 1993,)j
On May 28, 1929, the United States attorney for the Western District'! 
Pennsylvania, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in tn 
District Court of the United States for said district a libel praying seizure aj 
condemnation of 605 cans of frozen eggs at Pittsburgh, Pa., alleging thatT 
article had been shipped by Armour & Co., from Duluth, Minn., on or abol 
March 23, 1929, and transported from the State of Minnesota into the Stats 
Pennsylvania, and charging adulteration, in violation of the food and drugSuif
It was alleged in the libel that the article was adulterated in that it consisff 
in whole or in part of a filthy, decomposed, or putrid animal substance.
On June 21, 1929, Armour & Co., claimant, having admitted the alleganl! 
of the libel and having consented to the entry of a decree, judgment otm 
demnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court M 
the product be released to the said claimant upon payment of costs an'dl 
execution of a bond in the sum of $10,000, conditioned in part that thejl 
portion be separated from the bad portion and the latter destroyed or denatu 
ARTHUR M. HYDE, Secretary of Agri<nittuf$m
?J<zki