18621. Adulteration and alleged Misbranding of tomato catsup. IT. S. v. 151 Cases of Tomato Catsup. Default decree of condemnation, for- feiture, and destruction. (F. & D. Nos. 26330, 26331, 26332. I. S. No. 24226. S. No. 4648.) Examination of samples of tomato catsup from the shipment herein described having shown that the article was partially decomposed, and that the label bore an inconspicuous declaration of the added color present in the article, the Secre- tary of Agriculture reported the matter to the United States attorney for the Northern District of Texas. On May 6, 1931, the United States attorney filed in the District Court of the United States for the district aforesaid a libel praying seizure and con- demnation of 151 cases of tomato catsup, remaining in the original packages fn various lots at Lubbock, Slaton, and Lamesa, Tex., consigned by the Ozark Mountain Canning Co., of Springfield, Mo., alleging that the article had been shipped from Bentonville Ark., on or about November 8, 1930, and had been transported from the State of Arkansas into the State of Texas, and charging adulteration and misbranding in violation of the food and drugs act. The article was labeled in part: " Packed by Mid-Mountain Fruit Co., Bentonville, Ark." It was alleged in the libel that the article was adulterated in that it con- sisted .in part of a decomposed vegetable substance. Misbranding was alleged for the reason that the article was offered for sale under the distinctive name of another article; and for the further reason that the statement, "Tomato Catsup,*' appearing on the label, was false and misleading and deceived and misled the purchaser when applied to an artifi- cially colored tomato catsup, labeled with an inconspicuous declaration of added ?color. On June 15, 1931, no claimant having appeared for the propertyr judgment was entered finding the product adulterated, and ordering that it be condemned and forfeited and destroyed by the United States marshal. / AETHUB M. HYDE, Secretary of Agriculture.