19571. Misbranding of canned tomatoes. U. S. v. 1,075 Cases of Canned Tomatoes. Consent decree of condemnation. Product released under bond. (F. & D. No. 27596. I. S. No. 44452. S. No. 5626.) Examination of the canned tomatoes in the shipment involved in this action showed that the article fell below the standard promulgated by this department for canned tomatoes, in that it contained some decayed material, and excessive peel, and blemishes, and that it was not labeled to show that it was sub- standard. On December 23, 1931, the United States attorney for the Western District of Arkansas, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for the district aforesaid a libel praying seizure and condemnation of 1,075 cases of canned tomatoes, remaining in the original unbroken packages at Fort Smith, Ark., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce by the Westville Canning Co., West- ville, Okla., on or about August 12, 1931, and charging misbranding in violation of the food and drugs act as amended. It was alleged in the libel that the article was misbranded in that it was canned food and fell below the standard of quality and condition promulgated by the Secretary of Agriculture, since it contained decayed material and an excessive amount of peel and blemishes, and the labels did not bear a plain and conspicuous statement prescribed by the said Secretary, indicating that it fell below such a standard. On February 24,' 1932, the Griffin Grocery Co., Fort Smith, Ark., claimant, having admitted the allegations of the libel and having consented to the entry of a decree, judgment was entered ordering the product condemned. It was further ordered by the court that the said product be released to the claimant for relabeling and disposition in accordance with the Federal food and drugs act, under the supervision of this department, upon the filing of a bond in the sum of $1,500. AETHUB M. HYDE, Secretary of Agriculture.