19757. Misbranding of canned tomato sauce. V. S. v. Walter M. Field & Co., and Bayside Canning: Co. Pleas of guilty. "Walter M. Field & Co., fined $25. Bayside Canning: Co., fined 950. (F. & D. No. 27505. I. S. No. 12381.) This action was based on the interstate shipment of a quantity of canned tomato sauce, samples of which were found to be short of the declared weight. On February 15, 1932, the United States attorney for the Northern District of California, acting upon* a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for the district aforesaid an information against Walter M. Field & Co., a copartnership, San Francisco, Calif., and the Bayside Canning Co., a corporation, Also, Calif., alleging shipment by said defendants, in violation of the food and drugs act as amended, on or about January 13, 1931, from the State of California into the State of Washington, of a quantity of canned tomato sauce that was misbranded. The article was labeled in part; (Can) "Red and White Brand Concentrated Tomato Sauce * * * Contents 8 Oz." It was alleged in the information that the article was misbranded in that the statement " Contents 8 Oz.," borne on the can label, was false and mislead- ing, and for the further reason that the article was labeled as aforesaid so as to deceive and mislead the purchaser, since the cans did not contain 8 ounces of the article, but did contain a less amount. Misbranding was alleged for the further reason that the article was food in package form and the quantity of the contents was not plainly and conspicuously marked on the outside of the package, since the statement made was incorrect. t On February 29, 1932, Walter M. Field entered a plea of guilty for the partner"ship, Walter M, Field & Co., and the court imposed a fine of $25 against the said partnership. On the same date a plea of guilty was entered on behalf of the defendant corporation, and the court imposed a fine of $50 against the corporation. HHNBY A. WALLACE, Secretary of Agriculture.