20301. Adulteration of canned salmon. U.S. v. 2,728 Cases, et al., of Canned Salmon. Consent decree of condemnation and forfeiture. Prod- uct released under bond for separation and destruction of unfit portion. (F. & D. nos. 28781, 28791, 28821, 28855, 28993, 28996, 29000, 29048. Sample nos. 14982-A, 14993-A, 14994-A, 14995-A, 14996-A, 15256-A, 15258-A, 15262-A, 15274-A, 15284-A, 25566-A, 25576-A, 25578-A, 25581-A, 25585-A, 25586-A, 25587-A, 25610-A, 25612-A, 25617-A, 25618-A.) These actions involved various shipments of canned salmon which was found to be in part decomposed. On August 24, August 29, September 6, October 5, October 6, October 7, and October 14, 1932, the United States attorney for the Western District of Washington, acting upon reports by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for the district aforesaid libels praying seizure and condemnation of 7,344% cases of canned salmon, remaining in the original unbroken packages at Seattle, Wash., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce between the dates of July 5, 1932, and September 6, 1932, by the Superior Packing Co., from Tenakee, Alaska, to Seattle, Wash., and charging adulteration in violation of the Food and Drugs Act. On October 13, 1932, the libel filed on October 5, 1932, which had been erroneously drawn to cover 28 cases, was amended to include the correct amount recommended for seizure, namely 2,080 cases, the total amount covered by the eight libels after the said amendment being 9,398% cases. A portion of the article was labeled in part: (Case) "Eat More Salmon * * * Alaska Brand Salmon." A portion was labeled: (Can) "Hypatia Brand Pink Salmon * * * Oceanic Sales Co., Seattle * * * Distributors." A por- tion was labeled: (Can) "Edola Brand Pink Salmon * * * Oceanic Sales Co. Distributors, Seattle, Chicago." The remainder of the said article was unlabeled. It was alleged in the libels that the article was adulterated in that it con- sisted in part of a decomposed animal substance. The Superior Packing Co. entered an appearance as claimant, consented to the entry of a decree, and admitted the material allegations of the libels. On November 8, 1932, the eight libels having been consolidated into one cause of action, judgment of condemnation and forfeiture was entered. The court, having found that a portion of the cans might contain salmon which was wholesome and fit for human consumption, ordered that the product be released to the claimant upon payment of costs and the execution of a bond ill the sum of $5,000, conditioned that the product should not be sold or disposed, of contrary to the provisions of the Federal Food and Drugs Act and all other laws, and further conditioned that the claimant separate the cans con- taining good salmon from cans which contained decomposed salmon, and that the decomposed portion be destroyed in the process of separation. R. G. TUGWELL, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.