20358. Adulteration and Misbranding of fluidextract of ergot. U.S. v. Eleven 1-Pint Bottles of Fluidextract Ergot. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. (F. & D. no. 27652. I.S. no. 46167. S. no. 5700.) This action involved a quantity of a product represented to be fluidextract of ergot of pharmacopoeial standard which, upon examination, was found to possess a potency of not more than one half of that required by the United States Pharmacopoeia. On January 13, 1932, the United States attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States for the district aforesaid a libel praying seizure and condemnation of eleven 1-pint bottles of fluidextract of ergot, remaining in the original unbroken packages at Atlanta, Ga., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce on or about December 12, 1931, by the Standard Pharmaceutical Corporation from Baltimore, Md., to Atlanta, Ga., and charging adulteration and misbranding in violation of the Food and Drugs Act. The article was labeled in part: "Fluidextract Ergot (Fluid- extractum Ergotae) U.S.P." It was alleged in the libel that the article was adulterated in that it was sold under a name recognized in the United States Pharmacopoeia, and differed from the standard of strength as determined by the test laid down in the said pharmacopoeia and its own standard of strength was not stated upon the con- tainer. Adulteration was alleged for the further reason that the strength of the article fell below the professed standard of quality under which it was sold, • namely, " Fluidextract Ergot (Fluidextractum Ergotae) U.S.P. * * * Each cc. of this extract represents one gram or each fluidounce 456 grs. of Ergot." Misbranding was alleged for the reason that the statements on the label " Fluidextract Ergot (Fluidextractum Ergotae) U.S.P. Physiologically Tested * * * Each cc. of this extract represents one gram or each fluidounce 456 grs. of Ergot", were false and misleading. On November 11, 1932, no claimant having appeared for the property, judg- ment of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be destroyed by the United States marshal. R. G. TUGWELL, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.