20795. Misbranding of cottonseed meal. IT. S. v. East St. Louis Cotton Oil Co. (The Pine Blue Cotton Oil Mill). Plea of guilty. Fine, $25. (F. & D. no. 29515. I. S. no. 50956.) This case was based on the interstate shipment of a quantity of cottonseed meal which contained less than 43 percent of protein, the amount declared on the label, and which was also short weight. On April 17, 1933, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the District Court of the United States an information against the East St. Louis Cotton Oil Co., a corporation, trading at Pine Bluff, Ark., alleging shipment by said company, under the name of the Pine Bluff Cotton Oil Mill, a branch of the defendant corporation, on or about April 2, 1932, from the State of Arkansas into the State of Kansas, of a quantity of cottonseed meal that was mis- branded in violation of the Food and Drugs Act as amended. The article was labeled in part: (Tag) "100 Pounds Net Guaranteed Analysis Protein, not less than 43%, * * * Choctaw Sales Company, * * * Kansas City, Missouri." It was alleged in the information that the article was misbranded in that the statements, "100 Pounds Net Guaranteed Analysis Protein, not less than 43% ", borne on the tag attached to the sacks, were false and misleading, and for the further reason that the article was labeled as aforesaid so as to deceive and mislead the purchaser, since it contained less than 43 percent of protein, and each of a large number of the sacks contained less than 100 pounds of the article. Misbranding was alleged for the further reason that the article was food in package form and the quantity of the contents was not plainly and con- spicuously marked on the outside of the packages, since the statement made was incorrect. On May 15, 1933, a plea of guilty to the information was entered on behalf of the defendant company, and the court imposed a fine of $25. R. G. TUGWELL, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.