20879. Adulteration and Misbranding of aspirin tablets and amidopyrine tablets and Misbranding of Maydoll D. tablets. U. S. v. 2 Display Cards of Aspirin Tablets, et al. Default decrees of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. P. & D. nos. 29952, 29953, 30028, 30029. Sample nos. 21696-A, 21697-A, 21698-A, 31804-A, 31805-A.) These several cases involved a quantity of alleged 5-grain aspirin tablets that were found to contain approximately 2 grains each of aspirin; a quantity of so-called " Mayo D. tablets " that were represented to contain 5 grains each of a medicinal agent or agents, and which contained less than half the declared amount of such agent (sodium benzyl succinate) ; and a quantity of alleged 5-grain amidopyrine tablets that contained approximately 1.74 grains of amidopyrine each. The labels of the aspirin and Maydoll D. tablets bore unwarranted curative and therapeutic claims. On March 23 and March 30, 1933, the United States attorney for the Southern District of New York, acting upon reports by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court of the United States libels praying seizure and condemnation of 296 display cards each bearing a number of envelopes containing aspirin tablets, 22 boxes of Maydoll D. tablets, and 22 boxes of amidopyrine tablets at New York, N.Y. It was alleged in the libels that the articles had been shipped in interstate commerce on or about Feb- ruary 12, 1933, by the Mills Sales Co., from Chicago, Ill., to New York, N.Y., and that the aspirin and amidopyrine tablets were adulterated and mis- branded, and the hyde D. tablets were misbranded in violation of the Food and Drugs Act as amended. It was alleged in the libels that the aspirin tablets and the amidopyrine tablets were adulterated in that their strength fell below the professed stand- ard or quality under which they were sold, " 5 Grain Tablets." Misbranding was alleged for the reason that the statements " 5 grain tablets ", with respect to the aspirin tablets, the statement " Tablets—5 Grains. Amidopyrine", with respect to the amidopyrine tablets, and the statement " Tablets—5 Grains ", with respect to the Maydoll D. tablets, were false and mis- leading. Misbranding was alleged for the further reason that the, statements (display card) " Recommended for * * * Neuritis, * * * and other Aches & Pains * * * (to prevent gastric disturbances)", with respect to the aspirin tablets, and the statement, "For Dysmenorrhea (Painful Men- struation)", with respect to the Maydoll D. tablets, were false and fraudulent, since the articles contained no ingredients or combinations of ingredients capable of producing the curative and therapeutic effects claimed. On May 16, 1933, no claimant having appeared for the property, judgments of condemnation and forfeiture were entered, and it was ordered by the court that the products be destroyed by the United States marshal. R. G. TTTGWELL, Acting Secretary' of Agriculture.