22027. Adulteration and misbranding of apricot-, blackberry-, and cherry-flavored sirups. V. S. -r. Joseph B. Pabls, and Clemens A. Pabls. Pleas of guilty. Fine, ?25. (F. &. D. no. 28161. I.S. nos. 25673, 25674, 25676.) This case was based on interstate shipments of artificially flavored and colored Imitation fruit-flavored sirups. On December 13,1932, the United States attorney for the Northern District of Illinois, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court an information against Joseph B. Pahls and Clemens A. Pahls, members 23 72595—34 1 of a copartnership trading as Joe Grein and J. Pahls, Chicago Ill., alleging shipment by said defendants in violation of the Food and Drugs Act, on or about March 18, 1931, and May 27, 1931, from the State of Illinois into the State of Indiana, of quantities of apricot-, blackberry-, and cherry-flavored sirups which were adulterated and misbranded. The articles were labeled in part: (Bottles) " Look for the Lily G. and P. Brand Apricot [or " Blackberry " or " Cherry "J Flavored Syrup Artificially Colored Citric Acid Added * * * Joe Grein & J. Pahls. * * * Chicago." It was alleged in the information that the apricot sirup was adulterated in that an imitation apricot-flavored sirup containing no true apricot flavor but containing citric acid and artificial flavor and color had been substituted for apricot-flavored sirup to which had been added citric acid and artificial flavor and color, which the article purported to be, but was not, since it was not apricot-flavored sirup either before or after the addition of citric acid and artificial flavor and color. Adulteration of the blackberry- and cherry- sirups was alleged for the reason that imitation blackberry or cherry flavored sirups containing citric acid, artificially colored, and flavored with undeclared artificial flavor had been substituted for the articles. Misbranding was alleged for the reason that the statements, "Apricot Flavored Syrup ", " Blackberry Flavored Syrup ", " Cherry Flavored Syrup", borne on the labels, were false and misleading and for the further reason that the article was labeled so as to deceive and mislead the purchaser, since the articles were not fruit-flavored sirups but were imitations, and the word "imitation " was not borne on the labels of the containers. Misbranding was alleged for the further reason that the articles were imitations of other articles and were offered for sale under the distinctive names of such other articles, since the apricot sirup contained* no apricot, the blackberry sirup was not flavored with, blackberry, and the cherry sirup contained no true cherry flavor. On March 10, 1934, the defendants entered pleas of guilty, and the court imposed a fine of $25. M. L. WILSON, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.