22362. Misbranding of O. J.'s Beauty Lotion. U. S. v. 172 Packages of O. J.'s Beauty Lotion. Default decree of condemnation, forfeiture, and destruction. (F. & D. no. 31271. Sample no. 17983-A.) Examination of a sample of O. J.'s Beauty Lotion showed that it contained no ingredient or combination of ingredients capable of producing certain cura- tive and therapeutic effects claimed in the labeling. On October 28, 1933, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of Texas, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court a libel praying seizure and condemnation of 172 packages of O. J.'s Beauty Lotion at Beaumont, Tex., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce, on or about September 15, 1933, by O. J.'s Beauty Lotion Co., Inc., from Shreveport, La., and charging misbranding in violation of the Food and Drugs Act as amended. Analysis of a sample of the article by this Department showed that it con- sisted essentially of water, alcohol (32.8 percent), and small quantities of mercuric chloride, zinc sulphate, salicylic acid, and witch hazel. It was alleged in the libel that the article was misbranded in that the fol- lowing statements regarding the curative and therapeutic effects of the article, appearing in the labeling, -were false and fraudulent: (Carton and bottle) " Will positively remove Pimples * * * Liver Spots * * * and other Facial Blemishes. * * * Stimulates Circulation Nourishes Skin Tissues"; (cir- cular) " Obstinate cases, even eczema, respond amazingly. * * * comes to the rescue by purging the complexion of disfiguring pimples * * * Liver- spots and other facial blemishes. * * * for abrasions which might be fol- lowed by infection * * * prevents soreness and pimples caused by close shaving. * * * Dandruff * * * For eczema, ring worm, tetter. * * * itch and all skin pimples or other skin infections * * * If your skin has any disease or impurity beneath the surface, do not be alarmed if this Lotion draws it to the surface, for this it will certainly do, as it is the only way to obtain satisfactory results." On March 22, 1934, no claimant having appeared for the property, judgment of condemnation and forfeiture was entered, and it was ordered by the court that the product be destroyed by the United States marshal. M. L. WILSON, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.