22372. Misbranding of Plneforus No, 1 and Plneforus No. 2. I. S. v. 112 
Bottles of Plneforus No. 1, et al. Default decree of condemna- 
tion, forfeiture, and destruction. (F. & D, no, 32497. Sample nos. 
67335-A,  67336-A.)
Examination of the drug products involved in this case showed that they 
contained no ingredient or combination of ingredients capable of producing 
certain curative and therapeutic effects claimed in the labeling. The articles 
were labeled to convey the impression that they were composed of ingredients 
obtained from the pine tree, whereas they were not.
On April 3, 1934, the United States attorney for the Southern District of 
New York, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the 
district court a libel praying seizure and condemnation of 112 bottles of Pine- 
forus No. 1 and 187 bottles of Pineforus No. 2 at New York, N. Y., alleging 
that the articles had been shipped in interstate commerce on or about March 
10, 1934, by Harry J. Mooney, as a passenger on a coach line, from Chicago,