24325. Adulteration and misbranding of butter. U. S. v. 2,107 Plain' Prints, et al.. of Butter. Product ordered released under bond. (F. & D. no. 35158. Sample nos. n751-B, 11752-B.) This case involved an interstate shipment of butter which was short weight and a part of which was also deficient in milk fat. On January 9, 1935, the United States attorney for the District of Montana, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court a libel praying seizure and condemnation of 4,132 prints of butter at Butte, Mont., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce in part on or about December 8, 1934, and in part on or about December 12, 1934, by the Cudahy Packing Co., from Denver, Colo., and charging adulteration and mis- branding of a portion and misbranding of the remainder in violation of the Food and Drugs Act as amended. A portion of the article consisted of 1-pound prints labeled in part: (Parchment wrapper) "1 Lb. Net Weight * * *" Packed by The Cudahy Packing Co. Denver, Colo." The remainder of the article consisted of quarter-pound cubes, four in each carton labeled in part (Carton) "One Pound Net Weight Monogram Creamery Butter * * * The Cudahy Packing Co. General Offices Chicago." The libel alleged that a portion of the article was adulterated in that a product containing less than 80 percent of milk fat had been substituted for butter. Misbranding of the said portion was alleged for the reason that the statement "butter" on the label WPS false and misleading, since it contained less than 80 percent by weight of milk fat. Misbranding was alleged with respect +o both lots for the reason that the statement " One Pound Net Weight" was false and misleading, since the packages contained less than 1 pound, and for the further reason that it was food in package form and the quantity of the contents was- not plainly and conspicuously marked on the outside of the package since the statement made was incorrect. On January 23, 1935, the Cudahy Packing Co. having appeared as claimant for the property and having admitted the allegations of the libel, judgment was entered ordering that the product be released to the claimant under bond, con- ditioned that it should not be sold or otherwise disposed of contrary to the provisions of the Federal Food and Drugs Act and all other laws. M. L. WILSON, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.