24522. Misbranding of Stardom's Hollywood Diet. U. S. v. 42 Cases, et al., of Stardom's Hollywood Diet. Default decrees of condemnation and destruction. (F. & D. nos. 32965, 32966, 33013, 33014, 33015. Sample nos. 62764-A, 62765-A, 62771-A, 62775-A, 71526-A, 71578-A.) These cases involved a product which was misbranded because of unwar- ranted therapeutic and curative claims in the labeling. A portion of the ar- ticle was found to be short weight. On June 18 and June 28, 1934, the United States attorney for the Western District of New York, acting upon reports by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court libels praying seizure and condemnation of 54 cases and 159 packages of Stardom's Hollywood Diet, in part at Buffalo, N. Y., and in part at Rochester, N. Y. On June 23, 1934, a libel was filed in the Northern District of New York against 159 packages of the product at Syracuse, N. Y. On December 27, 1934, an amended libel was filed in the Northern District of New York. It was alleged in the libels that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce, between the dates of March 1 and June 14, 1934, by the Hollywood Diet Corporation, from Chicago, Ill., and that it was misbranded in violation of the Food and Drugs Act as amended. Analyses of samples showed that the article consisted essentially of sugar (20 percent), soybean flour, cocoa, and inorganic constituents including table salt. The article was alleged to be misbranded in that the following statements regarding its curative and therapeutic effects appearing in the labeling were false and fraudulent: "The Dawn Of A New Era In Weight Control A beau- tiful figure need no longer be a matter of birthdays. The possibility of your having an exciting type of Hollywood figure is now so real as to be actually breath-taking, and to gain it you won't have to go hungry, engage in violent exercises, use drugs or resort to laxatives; all of these methods are taboo. You need sacrifice none of your freshness, none of your vitality. And when you have reduced to your normal healthy weight, you should have no sagging, wrinkled skin, no strained, tired look or feeling. Not a whit of the sad re- sults so often obtained with strenuous reducing methods. Don't risk vitamin starvation—as beauty comes from within I Stardom's is not a reducing agent in the strict sense of the word, because it is neither drug nor laxative. On the contrary, it is a highly concentrated, delicious, pure food that you can take into your system and convert into energy instead of fat, thereby satisfying every pang of hunger. Stardom's is obviously as pure and safe as the food you eat . . . Yet fat simply vanishes. * * * Directions. Add one heaping teaspoon- ful of Stardom's to a glass of milk, water or any of the citrus fruit juices, such as orange, pineapple, grapefruit, tomato or grape juice. This should be taken in place of one or two fat-forming meals daily, followed by a cup of coffee or tea, if desired. However, eat one adequate meal daily, as your sys- tem needs bulk for proper elimination. Stardom's instantly dispels hunger, as it supplies your system with food elements which are alive, such as, Vita- mins A, B, C, D, and E, six Minerals, namely, lime, phosphorus, potassium, so- dium, chlorine, and magnesium, Lecithin, a nerve and brain food, and the car- bohydrates necessary to assist normal body activities in burning up existing fat as quickly as it can safely be done. Stardom's could well be named 'Miracle Food' as it is a vitalizer, normalizer, and slenderizer." Misbranding was al- leged with respect to a portion of the article, for the further reason that the statement on the label, "Net Contents Seven Ounces", was false and mislead- ing and tended to deceive and mislead the purchaser, and for the further reason that the article was food in package form and the quantity of the contents was not plainly and conspicuously marked on the outside of the package, since the statement made was incorrect. The Hollywood Diet Corporation entered an appearance as claimant in each case and filed answers to the original libels. On March 8, 1935, no amended answer having been filed to the amended libel filed in the Northern District of New York, judgment was entered in that case condemning the product and ordering that it be destroyed. On March 12, 1935, the answers filed in the remaining cases having been withdrawn, judgments of condemnation and de- struction were entered. M. L. WILSON, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.