25315. Misbranding of cottonseed cake and meal. U. S. v. East St. Louis Cotton Oil Co. (Pine Bluff Cotton OU Mill). Plea of guilty. Fine, 825. (F. & D. no. 35926. Sample nos. 27423-B, 33001-B to 33004-B, incl., 33008-B, 33009-B.) This case was based on interstate shipments of cottonseed cake and meal that contained less protein than declared on the label. On September 20, 1935, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of Arkansas, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court an information against the East St. Louis Cotton Oil Co., a cor- poration, trading as the Pine Bluff Cotton Oil Mill at Pine Bluff, Ark., alleging shipment by said company in violation of the Food and Drugs Act on or about January 24, February 14, February 16, and February 25, 1935, from the State of Arkansas into the State of Kansas, of quantities of cottonseed cake and meal which was misbranded. A portion of the article was labeled: "Chickasha Prime Cottonseed Cake or Meal * * * Guaranteed Analysis Protein, not less than 43.00 per cent." The remainder of the article was labeled: "Army Brand Prime Quality 43% Protein Cottonseed Cake and Meal Manufactured For Louis Tobian & Company Dallas, Texas Guaranteed Analysis: Crude Protein, not less than 43.00%." The article was alleged to be misbranded in that the statements, "Guaranteed Analysis Protein, not less than 43.00%", with respect to a portion of the product, and the statements, "43% Protein" and "Guaranteed Analysis: Crude Protein, not less than 43.00%", with respect to the remainder, borne on the tags attached to the sacks containing the article, were false and misleading, and for the further reason that it was labeled so as to deceive and mislead the purchaser since it did not contain 43 percent of protein but did contain a less amount. On October 12, 1935, a plea of guilty was entered on behalf of the defendant company and the court imposed a fine of $25. R. G. TUGWEIX, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.