26168. Misbranding of Deo Dennis Eucalyptus Ointment. IT. S. v. 105 Jars and 33 Tubes, and 408 Packages of Deo Dennis Eucalyptus Ointment. De- fault decrees of condemnation and destruction. (F. & D. nos. 87174, 37216. Sample nos. 60657-B, 60719-B.) These cases involved interstate shipments of Deo Dennis Eucalyptus Oint- ment the package label of which and an accompanying circular bore and con- tained false and fraudulent statements regarding its curative or therapeutic effect On February 11, 1936, the United States attorney for the District of Utah, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court a libel praying seizure and condemnation of 105 jars and 33 tubes of Deo Dennis Eucalyptus Ointment at Salt Lake City, Utah; and on February 18, 1936, the United States attorney for the District of Colorado similarly filed a libel praying seizure and condemnation of 408 packages of an article so labeled at Denver, Colo. It was alleged that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce on or about June 28 and November 29, 1935, and January 4, 1936, by the Davis Eucalyptus Laboratories from Oakland, Calif., and that it was misbranded in violation of the Food and Drugs Act as amended. Analysis of a sample of the article showed that it consisted essentially of eucalyptus oil with small amounts of menthol, camphor, and sassafras oil incorporated in an ointment base. The article was alleged to be misbranded in that statements regarding its curative or therapeutic effects, appearing on the label of the jars containing the article, and contained in circulars accompanying the jars and the tubes containing the article, falsely and fraudulently represented that the article was effective as a treatment and remedy for chest colds, nasal catarrh, bronchial catarrh, head noises, catarrhal deafness, asthma, hay fever, influenza, eczema, muscular stiffness, muscular pain, and muscular exhaustion; and effective for healing wounds, sores, carbuncles, boils, and itching piles. On March 28 and April 24, 1936, no claimant having appeared in either case, judgments of condemnation were entered and it was ordered that the product be destroyed. HARRY L. DOWD, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.