30552. Slisbrandingr of canned tomatoes.     U. S. v. 168 Cases of Canned Tomatoes.
Consent decree of condemnation.     Product released under bond to  be 
relabeled.     (F. & D. No. 40954.    Sample No. 42444-C.,)
This product was substandard since it did not consist of 50 percent of whole 
or large pieces, and it was not labeled to indicate that it was substandard.
On November 30, 1937, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of 
Texas, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district 
court a libel praying seizure and condemnation of 168 cases of canned tomatoes 
at Mainly, Tex.; alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate com- 
merce on or about September 25, 1937, by Putman Canning Co. from Avoca, 
Ark.; and charging misbranding in violation of the Food and Drugs Act. The 
article was labeled in part: "Putman Brand Hand Packed Tomatoes * * * 
Packed in Arkansas Ozarks."
It was alleged to be misbranded in that it was canned food and fell below the 
standard of quality and condition promulgated by the Secretary of Agriculture, 
since the fruit did not consist of whole or large pieces, less than 50 percent of 
the total contents of containers were retained after draining, and its package or 
label did not bear a plain and conspicuous statement prescribed by regulation of 
this Department indicating that it fell below such standard.
On March 14, 1938, W. T. Putman Canning Co., claimant, having admitted the 
allegations of the libel, judgment of condemnation was entered, and the product 
was ordered released under bond conditioned that it be relabeled in compliance 
with the law.
M. L. WILSON, Acting Secretary of Agriculture. 
167050°—39 1 
227