30772. Adulteration and misbranding of horseradish. IT. S. v. Golden Pickle Works, Inc. Plea of guilty. Fine, $50 on the first count. Imposition of sentence suspended on remaining counts, and defendant placed on probation for 60 days. (F. & D. No. 42651. Sample Nos. 3249-D, 25985-D.) This product was adulterated and misbranded .because other substances had been substituted in whole or in part for horseradish, which it purported to be. It was misbranded further because of failure of the label to bear a plain and conspicuous statement of the quantity of contents. On June 23, 1939, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of New York, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court an information against the Golden Pickle Works, Inc., Brooklyn, N. Y., alleging shipment by said company on or about May 27 and June 17, 1938, from the State of New York into the State of New Jersey, of quantities of horseradish which was adulterated and misbranded. The article was alleged to be adulterated in that a substance other than horseradish, namely, a mixture of ground turnip or ground parsnip, containing cornstarch and mustard oil, had been substituted for horseradish, which it purported to be. A portion of the article was alleged to be misbranded in that the statement "Horseradish," borne on the jar label, was false and misleading and was borne on said label so as to deceive and mislead the purchaser, since the article did not consist of horseradish, but did consist of a substance other than horseradish, namely, a mixture of ground turnip or ground parsnip, containing cornstarch and mustard oil. Further Misbranding of the said portion was alleged in that it was an imitation of horseradish, and was offered for sale and sold under the name of another article, namely, horseradish. Both lots were alleged to be misbranded in that the article was food in package form and the quantity of contents was not plainly and conspicuously marked on the outside of the package. On June 27, 1939, a plea of guilty was entered on behalf of the defendant and the court imposed a fine of $50 on count 1 of the information, and ordered that imposition of sentence be suspended on the remaining 4 counts. The defendant was placed on probation for 60 days. HARRY L. BROWN, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.