30977. Misbranding of Sodasal. IT. S. v. Harry Enkel (Sodasal Laboratories). Plea of guilty. Sentence of 1 year suspended and defendant placed on probation for 3 years. Fine of $100 also imposed. (F. & D. No. 42732. Sample Nos. 42944-D, 42971-D, 43181-D, 52224-D.) The labeling of this product bore false and fraudulent representations regard- ing its curative and therapeutic effects. On November 14, 1939, the United States attorney for the Eastern District of Michigan, acting upon a report by the Secretary of Agriculture, filed in the district court an information against Harry Enkel, trading as the Sodasal Laboratories, Detroit, Mich., alleging shipment by said defendant within the period from on or about January 14 to on or about March 4, 1939, from the State of Michigan into the State of Pennsylvania of quantities of Sodasal which was misbranded. Analysis of a sample taken from one of the shipments showed that it was a reddish liquid consisting largely of sugar and water, containing aminopyrine (approximately 8.8 grains per fluid ounce), salicylates of sodium and potassium (equivalent to approximately 33.5 grains per fluid ounce as sodium salicylate), citrates and bicarbonates of sodium and potassium, together with a suspension of magnesium and calcium salts. Analysis of samples taken from the other shipments showed that they were of substantially the same composition. The article was alleged to be misbranded in that statements, designs, and devices appearing in its labeling, regarding its curative and therapeutic effects, falsely and fraudulently represented that it was effective as an alkaline treat- ment (in some shipments as an "anti-acid treatment") ; effective as a treatment for rheumatic pains, aching muscles, lumbago, and simple, non-fever grippy dis- comfort; effective as an anti-rheumatic anodyne, diuretic, anti-acid and alka- lizer effective to give prompt relief from pain, knife-like pain, racking pain and rheumatoid suffering; to flush the kidneys; to expel uric acid, poisonous toxins and other impurities; to double the kidney flow and to fight blood acidity; effective as a treatment of serious ailments which often develop into kidney, blood, and heart trouble; effective in the treatment of stiffness, soreness, swell- ing or shrinkage in muscles and joints; effective to bring freedom from pain and to relieve torturing pains and agony; and effective as a treatment for advanced (chronic) and recurring cases. The article was also charged to be misbranded in violation of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act, as reported in notice of judgment No. 78 published under that act. On December 4, 1939, a plea of guilty having been entered, the court sen- tenced the defendant to 1 year's imprisonment and imposed a fine of $100 for violation of both acts. The prison sentence was suspended and the defendant was placed on probation for 3 years. GROVER B. HILL, Acting Secretary of Agriculture.