568. Adulteration of cream.     V. S. v. One 10-Gallon and Four 5-Gallon Cans of
Cream (and 11 otlier seizure actions involving cream). Consent decrees 
of condemnation and destruction. (F. D. C. Nos. 1770, 1771, 1772, 1774, 1775, 
1791, 1792, 1795, 1897, 1898, 1899, 1901. Sample Nos. 6401-E, 6402-E, 6403-E, 
6405-E, 6409-E, 6410-E, 6661-E, 6662-E, 6671-E, 6672-E, 6676-E, 6677-E.)
This product was in whole or in part filthy, putrid, or decomposed.
On March 6, 8, 15, 20, 22, and 27, 1940, the United States attorney for the" 
District of Colorado filed libels against thirteen 10-gallon cans, thirteen 5-gallon 
cans, five 8-gallon cans, and one 3-gallon can of cream at Denver, Colo., alleging 
that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce within" the period from 
on or about March 2 to March 24, 1940, by various shippers as follows: Campbell 
Produce Co., Benkelinan, Nebr.; Clare D. Whaley, Callaway, Nebr.; U. R. 
Wichern, Cody, Wyo.; H. L. Erickson, Holdridge, Nebr.; Guy M. Shafer, Clayton, 
N. Mex.; M. J. Ball, Hedley, Tex.; H. C. Gilliland, Joshua, Tex.; Roy Britt, 
Hedley, Tex.; Geo. A. Kump, Jennings, Nebr.; Mrs. Bluford C. Trusty, Grainton, 
Nebr.; J. A. Sterling, Potter, Nebr.; Howard McKay, Dresden, Kans.; H. A. 
Bohn, Athol, Kans.; John Kruse, Grinnell, Kans.; L. E. Hammerschmidt, Vic- 
toria, Kans.; John C. Schwab, Deaver, Wyo.; F. W. Barlow, Melrose, N. Mex.; 
Mrs. Myrl Bloom, Paxton, Nebr.; H. J. Langdon, Selden, Kans.; A. L. Bangert, 
Big Springs, Nebr.; Co-Op Union Merc. Co., Black Wolf, Kans. t Mrs. Alice Engle, 
Billings, Mont.; F. J. Farrell, Hartley, Nebr. (from Lebanon, Nebr.) ; L. L. Heard, 
Hartley, Tex. (from Channing, Tex,); J. H. Blakesley, Thermopolis, Wyo.; 
Adams Bros., Cozad, Nebr.; Kyle Johnson, Terreton, Idaho (from Hamer, Idaho) ; 
Paul Fiekenscher, Gothenburg, Nebr.; M. W. Woolstrum, Garland, Wyo. (from 
Lovell, Wyo.).
The article was alleged to be adulterated in that it consisted in whole or in 
part of a filthy, decomposed, and putrid animal substance.
The consignee having admitted the allegations of the libels and having con- 
sented to the entry of orders for the immediate destruction of the product, decrees 
were entered accordingly on the same dates as the institution of the action.
Si