1259. Adulteration of cream. U. S. v. Six 10-Gallon Cans of Cream (and five 
other seizure actions against cream). Consent decrees of condemna- 
tion and destruction. (F. D. C. Nos. 2440 to 2445, incl. Sample Nos. 3196-B 
to 3200-B, incl., 19203-B.)
This product was filthy and decomposed.
Between July 12 and 16, 1940, the United States attorney for the Western 
District of Pennsylvania filed 6 libels against a total of forty-seven 10-gallon 
cans, five 5-gallon cans, and one 8-gallon can of cream at Pittsburgh, Pa., 
alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce within the 
period from on or about July 10 to on or about July 14, 1940, in various consign- 
ments by Magnus C. White from Weston, W. Va.: Salem Feed & Flour Co. from 
Salem, W. Va.; B. L. Thomas from Brunswick, Md.; L. S. Kercheval from 
Winchester, Va.; Farmers Supply Co. from Morgantown, W. Va.; J. C. Cheek 
from White Hall, Md.; M. K. Bowers from Charles Town, W. Va.; T. C. Keiter 
from Martinsburg, W. Va.; by S. Mack Adams from Parsons, W. Va.; Mrs. 
K. W. MeGinnis^from WeUsburg, W. Va.; A. W. .Helbig from Oakland, Md.; 
Fairmont Creamery Co. from Strasburg, Va.; Mabel E.Turr from Brunswick, 
Md.; D. C. Hinkle from Petersburg, W. Va.; G. W. Richenback from New 
Martinsville, W. Va.; by R. Woodford from Phillippi, W. Va.; Mrs. John W. 
Fike from Friendsville, Md.; E. J. Snapp from Winchester, Va.; Edna Dustin 
from Laurel, Md.; Harold Chesrown from Mannington, W. Va.; W. Riggenbach 
from New Martinsville, W. Va.; J. T. Fisher & Son from Barnesville, Md.; 
Eldridge Geary from Hagerstown, Md.; J. A. Cupp from Buena Vista, Va.; 
R. F. Unger from Berkley Springs, W. Va.; T. C. Keiter from Gaithersburg, Md.; 
Mrs. Josie Mollohan from Sutton, W. Va.; and H. R. Stanley from EUenboro, 
W. Va.
The article was alleged to be adulterated in that it consisted in whole or in 
part of a filthy, putrid, or decomposed animal substance.
The consignees having consented to the entry of orders for the immediate 
destruction, of the product,- decrees were entered accordingly on the same dates 
as the institution of the actions.