1388. Misbranding of candy. U. S. v. 500 Boxes of Candy (and 2 other seizure actions against candy). Default decrees of condemnation. Portion of product delivered to charitable institutions, remainder ordered de- stroyed. (F. D. C. Nos. 1960, 2151, 2652. Sample Nos. 14804-B, 19033-E, 19034-E, 33094-E.) This case involved various kinds of candy that was packed in deceptive con- tainers. One lot of gum drops was packed in boxes, each of which contained about 3 ounces of candy but which could have held 1 pound of wrapped, or 1% pounds of unwrapped, gum drops. A second lot consisted of gum drops and taffy packed in boxes each containing 20 pieces of wrapped, loosely packed candy occupying about two-thirds of the space in the box. When shaken down and pressed lightly, the candy filled only about 40 percent of the capacity of the box. A third lot consisted of salt water taffy, which was wrapped in wax paper with twisted ends, and which when pressed down, occupied only about 60 percent of the space in the box. A fourth lot consisted of chocolate candies in cellophane-wrapped boxes with extension edges on the top and bottom. Each layer contained 12 pieces of candy separated by cardboard dividers, which were much too large for the size of the candies. Between May 14 and August 23, 1940, the United States attorneys for the District of New Jersey and the Western District of Pennsylvania filed libels against 500 boxes of candy at South River, N. J., 2 gross boxes at Union City, N J., and 166 cartons at Pittsburgh, Pa., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce within the period from on or about May 7 to on or about June 26, 1940, by Delight Sweets, Inc., from New York, N. Y.;. and charging that it was misbranded in that its containers were so made, formed, or filled as to be misleading. The article was labeled in part variously: "Gum Joy Assortment"; "Duplex Assortment Gums and Chews"; "Venetian Sweets Assorted Chews"; and "Moonbeam Assorted Chocolates." On September 25 and December 21, 1940, no claimant having appeared, judg- ments of condemnation were entered. The product seized in the Western Dis- trict of Pennsylvania was ordered destroyed and that seized in the District of New Jersey was ordered distributed to charitable institutions.