3772. Adulteration and misbranding of preserves. TJ. S. v. 14 Oases of Strawberry Preserves and 26 Cases of Assorted Preserves. Default decree of con- demnation and destruction. (F. D. C. No. 7548. Sample Nos. 72181-E to 72186-E. incl.) Examination of these products showed the presence of insect fragments and rodentlike hairs. All flavors but the strawberry were found to be deficient in fruit. On May 27, 1942, the United States attorney for the District of Arizona filed a libel against 14 cases of strawberry preserves and 26 cases of assorted preserves at Yuma, Ariz., alleging that the articles had been shipped in interstate commerce on or about March 16, 1942 by the Golden West Products Co. from Los Angeles, Calif.; and charging that they were adulterated and that portions were misbranded.- The articles were labeled in part: "Bonny Brae Brand Pure Strawberry [or "Black Raspberry," "Blackberry," "Boysenberry," or "Youngberry"] Preserves." All flavors were alleged to be adulterated in that they consisted in whole or in part of filthy substances and in that they had been prepared under insanitary conditions whereby they might have become contaminated with filth. All flavors but strawberry were alleged to be adulterated further in that articles deficient in fruit had been substituted in whole or in part for pure black raspberry, blackberry, boysenberry, or youngberry preserves, as defined by regulations as provided by law. All flavors with the exception of the strawberry were alleged to be misbranded in that the names "Pure Black Raspberry [or "Blackberry," "Boysenberry," or "Youngberry"] Preserves" were false and misleading as applied to articles that were deficient in fruit; (2) in that they were imitations of other foods and the labels failed to bear, in type of uniform size and prominence, the word "imita- tion" and, immediately thereafter, the name of the food imitated; (3) in that they purported to be and were represented as foods for which definitions and standards of identity had been prescribed by regulations as provided by law but they failed to conform to such definitions and standards since they did not contain the amounts of fruit specified in the regulations. On June 23, 1942, no claimant having appeared, judgment of condemnation was entered and the products were ordered destroyed.