3983. Misbranding of jellies and marmalade. TJ. S. v. 7 Cases of Currant Jelly, 6 Cases of Grape Jelly, and 6 Cases and 5 Cases of Orange Marmalade. Default docree of condemnation. Products ordered delivered to a chari- table institution. (F. D. C. No. 7149. Sample Nos. 84348-E to 84351-E, incl.) The currant jelly was an artificially colored jelly containing only small amounts of fruit juice, and simulating currant jelly in odor and taste. The orange marma- lade contained no orange juice, a normal Ingredient of orange marmalade, and did contain phosphoric acid and an artificial coal-tar color which were not declared in the list of ingredients. The grape jelly simulated grape jelly in appearance and odor, and contained phosphoric acid which was not declared in the list of ingredients. On April 7, 1942, the United States attorney for the District of New Jersey filed a libel against 7 cases of currant jelly, 6 cases of grape jelly, and 11 cases of \ orange marmalade at Newark, N. J., alleging that the articles had been shipped / in interstate commerce on or about February 11 and 26, 1942, by the Well Maid Products Co. from New York, N. Y.; and charging that they were misbranded. They were labeled in part: (Jars) ."Currant Jelly [or "Grape Jelly"] (Below Standard) Ingredients:—Currant Juice [or "Grape Juice"], Cane Sugar, Pectin, Water, Certified Food Color, Citric Acid"; or "Orange Marmalade Ingredients:— Orange Peel, Sugar, Water, Pectin, Citric Acid." The articles were alleged to be misbranded in that they were imitations of other foods and their labels failed to bear, in type of uniform size and prominence, the word "imitation" and, immediately thereafter, the name of the food imitated. The orange marmalade and grape jelly were alleged to be misbranded further' in that they were offered for sale under the names of other foods. The orange marmalade was alleged to be misbranded further in that the statement "Orange Marmalade Ingredients:—Orange Peel, Sugar, Water, Pectin, Citric Acid" was false and misleading as applied to an article containing no orange juice, and containing phosphoric acid and an artificial coal-tar color; and in that it contained artificial coloring but did not bear labeling stating that fact. The grape jelly was alleged to be misbranded further in that the statement "Ingredients:—Grape Juice, Cane Sugar, Pectin, Water, Certified Food Color, Citric Acid" was mislead- ing as applied to an article containing phosphoric acid. On August 14, 1942, no claimant having appeared, judgment of condemnation was entered and the products were ordered delivered to a charitable institution.