5787. Misbranding of Thompson's Dally Vitamin and Mineral Ration. IT. S. v. 8 Cartons of Thompson's Daily Vitamin and Mineral Ration. Consent decree of condemnation. Product ordered released under bond for re- labeling. (F. D. C. No. 9040. Sample No. 13242-F.) This product was represented in its labeling as supplying 1% times the minimum adult daily requirements of vitamins A and D, the minimum adult daily require- ment of vitamin C and riboflavin, and 3 times the minimum adult daily require- ment of vitamin Bi. It was also represented as containing specified amounts, of vitamin B3, niacin amide, pantothenic acid, and biotin, as well as calcium, phos- phorus, iodine, iron, and copper. On December 24, 1942, the United States attorney for the Western District of Washington filed a libel against 8 cartons, each containing 100 boxes, of the above-named product at Seattle, Wash., alleging that the article had been shipped in interstate commerce on or about October 12,15, and 20,1942, from Los Angeles, Calif., by the William T. Thompson Co.; and charging that it was misbranded. The article was alleged to be misbranded in that the following statements appearing on the display card accompanying the article, "Vitamins For Vitality Improve your health! . . . Take the drudgery out of work ... Put more pep in your play ... Reduce colds . . . Cut down fatigue ... Improve appetite and digestion ... Build nervous stability . . . Prevent impaired eyesight due to Vita- min deficiencies ... Build up your blood count ... Prevent dental cavities, bleeding gums, due to deficiencies of Vitamins D, C, and Calcium," were false and misleading since such statements represented and suggested that the article would be effective for the purposes and conditions stated and implied, whereas it would not be so effective. The article was also alleged to be misbranded under the provisions of law applicable to drugs, as reported in notices of judgment on drugs and devices, No. 997. On January 14, 1943, the William T. Thompson Co., claimant, having admitted the allegations of the libel, judgment of condemnation was entered and the prod- uct was ordered released under bond for relabeling under the supervision of the Food and Drug Administration.